Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;145(10):2547-2554. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02983-3. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an effective treatment option for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and it is usually delivered in conventional fractionation or with moderate hypofractionation (hRT), with comparable results. In the last years, a new treatment approach with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown promising results. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the toxicity and outcome between hRT and SBRT in low and favorable intermediate PCa patients.
The hRT schedules were: 71.4 Gy or 74.2 Gy in 28 fractions for low- or favorable intermediate-risk PCa, respectively, while the SBRT schedules were: 35 Gy or 37.5 Gy in five fractions, for low or favorable intermediate risk, respectively. Toxicity assessment was performed according to CTCAE v5.0 grading. The International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) was also recorded.
One hundred forty-nine patients were analyzed, overall 81 (54.36%) patients were low risk and 68 (45.64%) were favorable intermediate risk. Sixty-nine (46.3%) patients were treated with hypo-RT and 80 (53.7%) with SBRT. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 11-58 months). The actuarial survival rate was 98.66%. The 3-years BFS rates were 95.5% and 100% for hRT and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.051). One case (0.6%) of acute grade 3 urinary toxicity occurred in a patient with favorable intermediate risk treated with hRT. He initially suffered gross hematuria and acute urinary retention not treatable with urinary catheter, therefore a suprapubic catheter was placed and steroids were administered. No differences in acute, late or severe toxicity were detected.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy reported a good clinical outcome and safe toxicity profile. Results are comparable to hRT, but a longer follow-up is needed to assess the late effectiveness and toxicity.
外照射放疗(EBRT)是治疗低危和中危前列腺癌(PCa)的有效方法,通常采用常规分割或适度超分割(hRT),疗效相当。近年来,立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的新治疗方法显示出良好的效果。本研究旨在直接比较低危和中危 PCa 患者中 hRT 和 SBRT 的毒性和结果。
hRT 方案为:低危或中危 PCa 患者分别接受 71.4Gy 或 74.2Gy,28 次分割;SBRT 方案为:低危或中危患者分别接受 35Gy 或 37.5Gy,5 次分割。毒性评估采用 CTCAE v5.0 分级。还记录了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。
共分析了 149 例患者,总体 81 例(54.36%)为低危,68 例(45.64%)为中危。69 例(46.3%)接受 hRT 治疗,80 例(53.7%)接受 SBRT 治疗。中位随访时间为 33 个月(11-58 个月)。 actuarial 生存率为 98.66%。hRT 和 SBRT 的 3 年 BFS 率分别为 95.5%和 100%(p=0.051)。1 例(0.6%)中危患者在接受 hRT 治疗后发生急性 3 级尿毒性。他最初出现肉眼血尿和急性尿潴留,无法用导尿管治疗,因此放置了耻骨上导管,并给予了类固醇。未发现急性、迟发性或严重毒性的差异。
立体定向体部放疗报告了良好的临床结果和安全的毒性特征。结果与 hRT 相当,但需要更长的随访时间来评估晚期疗效和毒性。