Suppr超能文献

父母在儿童疼痛情境中的不公正评价:IEQ-Pc 和 IEQ-Ps 的结构和效标效度检验。

Parental Injustice Appraisals in the Context of Child Pain: Examining the Construct and Criterion Validity of the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps.

机构信息

Department of Experimental, Clinical, and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Pain. 2020 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):195-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

Abstract

A growing pediatric and adult literature highlights the role of injustice appraisals in adjustment to pain. However, interpersonal injustice dynamics have remained largely unexplored. The present study investigated the factor structure and criterion validity of parentally adjusted versions of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire, assessing child-oriented (IEQ-Pc) and self-oriented appraisals (IEQ-Ps) in the context of child pain. Participants were triads of healthy children (N = 407, M = 12) and both their parents and dyads of children with chronic pain (N = 319, M = 14) and 1 parent. In both samples, children completed measures of functional disability and quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and academic); parents completed the IEQ-Pc, IEQ-Ps, and a measure of parental catastrophizing about child pain. Across samples, a confirmatory oblique two-factor model (Severity/Irreparability-Blame/Unfairness) provided a better fit to the data compared to a one-factor model; nevertheless, the two-factor solution was considered suboptimal. A post hoc exploratory factor analysis consistently revealed 1 factor. In terms of criterion validity, the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps demonstrated differential associations depending on the child's pain versus healthy status, independent of parental catastrophizing. Further, findings in the healthy sample indicated that fathers' self-oriented injustice appraisals related to lower child social function. In the clinical sample, parental child-oriented injustice appraisals related to greater child functional disability and lower physical, emotional, social, and academic function. Current findings support the unique role of parental injustice appraisals, assessed by the IEQ-Pc and IEQ-Ps, in understanding child pain, but also suggest these may only partially capture the phenomenology of parental injustice appraisals in the context of child pain. PERSPECTIVE: This manuscript presents an examination of the construct and criterion validity of 2 parentally adjusted versions of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire. These measures could be valuable tools for clinicians in examining how parents respond to their child's pain as it impacts both the child's life and the parents'.

摘要

越来越多的儿科和成人文献强调了不公正评价在疼痛适应中的作用。然而,人际间的不公正动态在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究调查了父母调整后的不公正体验问卷的因子结构和效标效度,评估了儿童导向(IEQ-Pc)和自我导向的评价(IEQ-Ps)在儿童疼痛背景下的情况。参与者是健康儿童的三人组(N=407,M=12)和他们的父母以及患有慢性疼痛的儿童的二人组(N=319,M=14)和 1 位家长。在两个样本中,儿童都完成了功能障碍和生活质量(身体、情感、社会和学业)的测量;父母完成了 IEQ-Pc、IEQ-Ps 和父母对儿童疼痛的灾难化测量。在两个样本中,验证性斜交双因素模型(严重程度/不可挽回性-责备/不公平)比单因素模型更适合数据;然而,双因素解决方案被认为不太理想。事后探索性因素分析一致显示有 1 个因素。就效标效度而言,IEQ-Pc 和 IEQ-Ps 根据儿童的疼痛与健康状况表现出不同的关联,与父母的灾难化无关。此外,在健康样本中的发现表明,父亲的自我导向的不公正评价与儿童的社会功能较低有关。在临床样本中,父母对儿童的不公正评价与儿童的功能障碍更大以及身体、情感、社会和学业功能较低有关。目前的研究结果支持父母不公正评价的独特作用,由 IEQ-Pc 和 IEQ-Ps 评估,在理解儿童疼痛方面,但也表明这些可能仅部分捕捉到父母在儿童疼痛背景下不公正评价的现象学。观点:本文介绍了父母调整后的不公正体验问卷的 2 个版本的结构和效标效度的检验。这些测量工具对于临床医生来说可能是很有价值的工具,可以用来检查父母如何应对孩子的疼痛,因为这既影响孩子的生活,也影响父母的生活。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验