Department of Dermatology, Maibach Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;108:104428. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104428. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Human skin is a viable pathway for administration of therapeutics. Transdermal delivery systems (TDS) have been approved by the US-FDA since 1981. To enable the risk assessment of dermal exposure, predictive mathematical models are used. In this work the accuracy of predicted flux of the models is compared to experimental human in vivo data of drugs applied in US-FDA approved TDS. A database of pharmacokinetic data of drugs applied in TDS was used and updated. Three mathematical models (QSAR) were used to calculate predicted fluxes, and compared to the human in vivo data. For more than half of the drugs applied in TDS, the predicted flux by the mathematical models was an underestimation compared to the flux calculated with the experimental in vivo data. The flux was over- or underestimated by a factor 10-100. All mathematical models were significantly correlated with the experimental in vivo data. The process of percutaneous penetration has several influencing factors, TDS minimize some of these factors. Limitations are discussed. Further research is needed, with a focus on validation and standardization of the permeability coefficient. This work offers observations that should give a stimulus for refinement on the appropriate usage and limitations of mathematical models.
人体皮肤是治疗药物给药的可行途径。自 1981 年以来,透皮给药系统(TDS)已获得美国 FDA 的批准。为了能够对皮肤暴露风险进行评估,使用了预测性数学模型。在这项工作中,将模型预测通量的准确性与已批准的 TDS 中应用的药物的人体体内实验数据进行了比较。使用和更新了一个 TDS 中应用药物的药代动力学数据的数据库。使用了三种数学模型(QSAR)来计算预测通量,并与人体体内数据进行比较。对于 TDS 中应用的一半以上的药物,与用实验体内数据计算的通量相比,数学模型预测的通量被低估了。通量被高估或低估了 10-100 倍。所有数学模型均与实验体内数据显著相关。经皮渗透过程有几个影响因素,TDS 最小化了其中一些因素。讨论了局限性。需要进一步研究,重点是验证和标准化渗透系数。这项工作提供了一些观察结果,这些结果应该会刺激对数学模型的适当使用和限制进行改进。