From the Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Cardiac Arrhythmias Therapeutic Service Center, China (H.L., Y.L., W.C., H.D., Z.W., Y.X., Z.L., J.F., P.X., B.Z., L.G., Y.Y.).
Department of Cardiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY (J.W.).
Hypertension. 2019 Sep;74(3):536-545. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12680. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can result in substantial blood pressure (BP) elevation, and the change was significantly blunted when repeated stimulation after ablation. However, whether RNS could provide a meaningful renal nerve mapping for identification of optimal ablation targets in renal denervation (RDN) is not fully clear. Here, we compared the antihypertensive effects of selective RDN guided by two different BP responses to RNS and explored the nerve innervations at these sites in Kunming dogs. Our data indicated that ablation at strong-response sites showed a more systolic BP-lowering effect than at weak-response sites (P=0.002), as well as lower levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine in kidney and a greater reduction in plasma norepinephrine (P=0.004 for tyrosine hydroxylase, P=0.002 for both renal and plasma norepinephrine). Strong-response sites showed a greater total area and mean number of renal nerves than weak-response sites (P=0.012 for total area and P<0.001 for mean number). Systolic BP-elevation response to RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP-elevation to RNS after RDN were correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks follow-up (R=0.649; P=0.012 and R=0.643; P=0.013). Changes of plasma norepinephrine and renal norepinephrine levels at 4 weeks were also correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks (R=0.837, P<0.001 and R=0.927, P<0.001). These data suggest that selective RDN at sites with strong BP-elevation response to RNS could lead to a more efficient RDN. RNS is an effective method to identify the nerve-enriched area during RDN procedure and improve the efficacy of RDN.
肾神经刺激 (RNS) 可导致血压显著升高,消融后重复刺激可显著减弱这种血压升高。然而,RNS 是否能为肾去神经(RDN)提供有意义的肾神经定位,以确定最佳消融靶点,目前尚不完全清楚。在此,我们比较了两种不同血压反应指导下的选择性 RDN 的降压效果,并在昆明犬中探讨了这些部位的神经支配。我们的数据表明,在强反应部位消融的降压效果优于在弱反应部位(P=0.002),同时肾组织和血浆中酪氨酸羟化酶和去甲肾上腺素的水平也更低,血浆去甲肾上腺素的水平也更低(P=0.004 用于酪氨酸羟化酶,P=0.002 用于肾和血浆去甲肾上腺素)。强反应部位的肾神经总面积和平均数量均大于弱反应部位(P=0.012 用于总面积,P<0.001 用于平均数量)。RDN 前 RNS 引起的收缩压升高反应和 RDN 后收缩压升高反应的减弱与 4 周随访时的收缩压变化相关(R=0.649;P=0.012 和 R=0.643;P=0.013)。4 周时血浆去甲肾上腺素和肾去甲肾上腺素水平的变化也与 4 周时的收缩压变化相关(R=0.837,P<0.001 和 R=0.927,P<0.001)。这些数据表明,在对 RNS 引起的血压升高反应强烈的部位进行选择性 RDN 可能会导致更有效的 RDN。RNS 是一种在 RDN 过程中识别富含神经的区域并提高 RDN 效果的有效方法。