• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代码关键:改善急诊科危重症患者的护理提供。

Code Critical: Improving Care Delivery for Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department.

出版信息

J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Mar;46(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2019.04.001
PMID:31327481
Abstract

PROBLEM

Although certain critically ill patients in emergency departments-such as those experiencing trauma, stroke, and myocardial infarction-often receive care through coordinated team responses, resource allocation and care delivery can vary widely for other high-acuity patients. The absence of a well-defined response process for these patients may result in delays in care, suboptimal outcomes, and staff dissatisfaction. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to develop, implement, and evaluate an ED-specific alert team response for critically ill medical adult and pediatric patients not meeting criteria for other medical alerts.

METHODS

Lean (Lean Enterprise Institute, Boston, MA) principles and processes were used to develop, implement, and evaluate an ED-specific response team and process for critically ill medical patients. Approximately 300 emergency nurses, providers, technicians, unit secretaries/nursing assistants, and ancillary team members were trained on the code critical process. Turnaround and throughput data was collected during the first 12 weeks of code critical activations (n = 153) and compared with historical controls (n = 168).

RESULTS

After implementing the code critical process, the door-to-provider time decreased by 62%, door to laboratory draw by 76%, door-to-diagnostic imaging by 46%, and door-to-admission by 19%. A year later, data comparison demonstrated sustained improvement in all measures.

DISCUSSION

Emergency nurses and providers see the value of coordinated team response in the delivery of patient care. Team responses to critical medical alerts can improve care delivery substantially and sustainably.

摘要

问题

尽管某些急诊科的危急重症患者(如经历创伤、中风和心肌梗死的患者)经常通过协调的团队反应接受治疗,但其他高急症患者的资源分配和护理提供可能存在很大差异。这些患者缺乏明确的反应过程可能导致护理延误、治疗效果不佳和员工不满。本质量改进项目的目的是为不符合其他医疗警报标准的危急重症成年和儿科患者开发、实施和评估特定于急诊科的警报团队反应。

方法

采用精益(马萨诸塞州波士顿精益企业协会)原则和流程,开发、实施和评估特定于急诊科的危急重症患者反应团队和流程。大约 300 名急诊护士、医护人员、技师、科室秘书/护理助理和辅助团队成员接受了关键代码流程的培训。在关键代码激活的前 12 周(n=153)收集周转和吞吐量数据,并与历史对照(n=168)进行比较。

结果

实施关键代码流程后,从进入急诊科到主治医生的时间缩短了 62%,从进入急诊科到实验室采血的时间缩短了 76%,从进入急诊科到诊断性影像学检查的时间缩短了 46%,从进入急诊科到收治入院的时间缩短了 19%。一年后,数据比较显示所有指标均持续改善。

讨论

急诊护士和医护人员看到了团队协作在提供患者护理方面的价值。对关键医疗警报的团队反应可以显著和可持续地改善护理提供。

相似文献

1
Code Critical: Improving Care Delivery for Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department.代码关键:改善急诊科危重症患者的护理提供。
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Mar;46(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Evaluation of a Practice Improvement Protocol for Patient Transfer From the Emergency Department to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit After a Level I Trauma Activation.一级创伤启动后患者从急诊科转至外科重症监护病房的实践改进方案评估
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar;45(2):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Quality of care using a multidisciplinary team in the emergency room.在急诊室使用多学科团队的护理质量。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Jun;58(6):A4227.
4
Improving the handover and transport of critically ill pediatric patients.改善危重新生儿的交接和转运。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jan;28(1-2):56-65. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14627. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Difficult airway response team: a novel quality improvement program for managing hospital-wide airway emergencies.困难气道反应小组:一项用于管理全院气道紧急情况的新型质量改进计划。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):127-139. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000691.
6
Emergency Surgical Airways Following Activation of a Difficult Airway Management Team in Hospitalized Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series.住院危重症患者困难气道管理团队启动后行紧急外科气道:病例系列研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):517-526. doi: 10.1177/0885066616680594. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
7
Emergency department organisation of critical care transfers in the UK.英国急诊科危重症转运的组织架构
Emerg Med J. 2005 Nov;22(11):795-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.017822.
8
Health Care Provider in Triage to Improve Outcomes.在分诊中改善治疗结果的医疗服务提供者。
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Sep;45(5):561-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
Improvement through Small Cycles of Change: Lessons from an Academic Medical Center Emergency Department.通过小周期变革实现改进:来自一所学术医疗中心急诊科的经验教训
J Healthc Qual. 2017 Sep/Oct;39(5):259-269. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12078.
10
Emergency department physician activation of the catheterization laboratory and immediate transfer to an immediately available catheterization laboratory reduce door-to-balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急诊科医生启动导管室并立即转至随时可用的导管室可缩短ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的门球时间。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 3;116(1):67-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.677401. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Multidisciplinary Team Activation for Patients with Severe Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Creation of the Code GI Bleed Protocol.一种针对严重胃肠道出血患者的新型多学科团队启动模式:制定消化道出血急救预案。
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 26;16:55-58. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S404247. eCollection 2023.
2
Quality of care, resource use and patient outcome by use of emergency response team compared with standard care for critically ill medical patients in the emergency department: a retrospective single-centre cohort study from Norway.使用急救反应团队与标准护理对比对急诊科危重症医学患者的护理质量、资源使用和患者结局的影响:来自挪威的一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e047264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047264.
3
Multidisciplinary Kaizen Event to Improve Adherence to a Sepsis Clinical Care Guideline.
多学科改善活动以提高对脓毒症临床护理指南的依从性
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Jun 23;6(4):e435. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000435. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
4
Methodological Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.方法学途径支持急诊科流程改进:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082664.