Suppr超能文献

体现的短暂性:调查二十世纪科学技术展示和空间化的方法和历史编纂学。

Embodied ephemeralities: Methodologies and historiographies for investigating the display and spatialization of science and technology in the twentieth century.

机构信息

Department of Prints and Drawings, British Museum, London, UK.

出版信息

Hist Sci. 2021 Jun;59(2):197-219. doi: 10.1177/0073275319858528. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

Exhibitions are embodied knowledge, and the processes of making exhibitions are also in themselves knowledge production practices. Science and technology exhibitions are therefore doubly of interest to historians of science: both as epistemic agents and as research methods. Yet both exhibitions and exhibition-making practices are ephemeral, as is the subsequent experience of the visitor. How can we research, interrogate, and understand both the productive creation of exhibitions and the phenomenologies and epistemologies of their reception and impact? "Exhibition histories" has become a significant field of late, most closely associated with research on art exhibitions but also extending to world and trade fairs, and now increasingly crossing over into histories of science and technology. It is not an easy task: the range of exhibition archive materials includes - but is not limited to - 35mm slides, architectural blueprints, models, drawings, briefs, memos, budgets, press films, reviews, and personal accounts. This primary material is distributed unevenly across public and organized repositories, closed commercial archives, the personal papers of designers, often embargoed national bureaus of information, and more. Further, the experience of visiting an exhibition leaves far fewer traces to follow, requiring the researcher to do different kinds of things with the same widely varied material. This paper proposes methodologies for historians of science and technology wishing to understand the spatialization of science in exhibition contexts, the impacts of science exhibitions, and the more elusive phenomenological aspects of the exhibition visitor experience. Historians of science must accurately historicize context while researching both along and against the grain of archival material left by the making of exhibitions, as well as understanding the embodied trajectories of visitors. The practice of exhibitions can also offer the researcher critically valuable insights into what to look for - and what may be absent - in archival records.

摘要

展览是体现知识的,制作展览的过程本身也是知识生产实践。因此,科学技术展览对科学史家来说具有双重意义:既是认识主体,也是研究方法。然而,展览和展览制作实践都是短暂的,参观者的后续体验也是如此。我们如何研究、质疑和理解展览的创造性制作以及它们的接受和影响的现象学和认识论?“展览史”最近已成为一个重要领域,与艺术展览研究密切相关,但也扩展到世界和贸易展览会,现在越来越多地跨越到科学技术史领域。这并非易事:展览档案材料的范围包括但不限于 35 毫米幻灯片、建筑蓝图、模型、图纸、简报、备忘录、预算、新闻片、评论和个人陈述。这些主要材料在公共和有组织的存储库、封闭的商业档案、设计师的个人论文、经常被禁的国家信息局等之间分布不均。此外,参观展览留下的痕迹很少,需要研究人员用相同的广泛多样的材料做不同的事情。本文为希望了解科学在展览背景下的空间化、科学展览的影响以及更难以捉摸的展览参观者体验的科学技术史家提出了方法。历史学家在研究展览制作留下的档案材料的同时,必须准确地将背景置于历史背景中,既要顺应材料,也要逆着材料进行研究,同时还要了解参观者的身体轨迹。展览实践还可以为研究人员提供批判性的宝贵见解,了解在档案记录中应该寻找什么——以及可能缺失什么。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验