• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Alcohol demand moderates brief motivational intervention outcomes in underage young adult drinkers.酒精需求缓和了未成年年轻成年饮酒者短暂动机性干预的结果。
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106044. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106044. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
2
Brief Motivational Intervention for Underage Young Adult Drinkers: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.未成年青少年饮酒者的简短动机干预:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1342-1351. doi: 10.1111/acer.13770. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes.简短酒精干预结果的行为经济学预测因素
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1033-43. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000032. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
The behavioral economics of alcohol demand in Greek-affiliated college students.希腊裔大学生群体中酒精需求的行为经济学。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Nov;45(11):2322-2334. doi: 10.1111/acer.14704. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
5
Alcohol demand assessed daily: Validity, variability, and the influence of drinking-related consequences.每日评估酒精需求量:效度、变异性及饮酒相关后果的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 1;208:107838. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107838. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
6
How does brief motivational intervention change heavy drinking and harm among underage young adult drinkers?简短的动机干预如何改变未成年青年饮酒者的重度饮酒行为及危害?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):447-458. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
7
When wanting to change is not enough: automatic appetitive processes moderate the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in hazardous-drinking college students.当仅仅有改变的意愿还不够时:自动的欲望过程会调节短期酒精干预对危险饮酒大学生的影响。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Dec 7;7(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-25.
8
Increased behavioral economic demand and craving for alcohol following a laboratory alcohol challenge.实验室酒精激发后行为经济学需求增加及对酒精的渴望
Addiction. 2015 Sep;110(9):1421-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12897. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
A Novel Approach for Streamlining Delivery of Brief Motivational Interventions to Mandated College Students: Using Group and Individual Sessions Matched to Level of Risk.一种简化向受强制要求的大学生提供简短动机干预措施的新方法:采用与风险水平相匹配的小组和个别辅导课程。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Dec 6;52(14):1883-1891. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1318148. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Gender and depression moderate response to brief motivational intervention for alcohol misuse among college students.性别和抑郁情绪会调节大学生酒精滥用简短动机干预的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):984-92. doi: 10.1037/a0037039. Epub 2014 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
2
Associations between alcohol demand, delayed reward discounting, and high-intensity drinking in a diverse emerging adult sample.在一个多样化的新兴成年人群体中,酒精需求、延迟奖励折扣与高度饮酒之间的关联。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Aug;31(4):829-838. doi: 10.1037/pha0000653. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Cannabis Use Disorder: A Behavioral Economic Perspective.大麻使用障碍:行为经济学视角
Curr Addict Rep. 2022 Mar;9(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s40429-021-00405-4. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Purchase Task for measuring the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.酒精购买任务测量酒精强化效力的同时效度:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2635-2650. doi: 10.1111/add.15379. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Concurrent validity of the alcohol purchase task in relation to alcohol involvement: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.酒精购买任务与酒精使用相关的同时效度:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035400.
6
Behavioral economic demand and delay discounting are differentially associated with cigarette dependence and use in adolescents.行为经济学需求和延迟折扣与青少年的吸烟依赖和使用呈不同相关。
Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106225. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106225. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a brief alcohol intervention supplemented with a substance-free activity session or relaxation training.一项评估简短酒精干预辅以无物质活动课程或放松训练疗效的随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Jul;87(7):657-669. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000412. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process: Update on the state of the science.过度低估延迟强化物的价值:科学研究现状更新。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Dec;30:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
Behavioral economic demand assessments in the addictions.成瘾行为的经济需求评估。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Dec;30:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
NIAAA's College Alcohol Intervention Matrix.美国国家酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所的大学酒精干预矩阵。
Alcohol Res. 2018;39(1):43-47.
5
Brief Motivational Intervention for Underage Young Adult Drinkers: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.未成年青少年饮酒者的简短动机干预:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1342-1351. doi: 10.1111/acer.13770. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
6
Binary components of food reinforcement: Amplitude and persistence.食物强化的二元成分:幅度和持续时间。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Magnitude and Trends in Heavy Episodic Drinking, Alcohol-Impaired Driving, and Alcohol-Related Mortality and Overdose Hospitalizations Among Emerging Adults of College Ages 18-24 in the United States, 1998-2014.1998 - 2014年美国18 - 24岁大学适龄新兴成年人中重度暴饮、酒后驾车、与酒精相关的死亡率及过量用药住院情况的规模和趋势
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jul;78(4):540-548. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.540.
8
Latent factor structure of a behavioral economic marijuana demand curve.行为经济学大麻需求曲线的潜在因素结构
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Aug;234(16):2421-2429. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4633-6. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
Tests of Simple Slopes in Multiple Regression Models with an Interaction: Comparison of Four Approaches.具有交互作用的多元回归模型中简单斜率的检验:四种方法的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;52(4):445-464. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1309261. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
How does brief motivational intervention change heavy drinking and harm among underage young adult drinkers?简短的动机干预如何改变未成年青年饮酒者的重度饮酒行为及危害?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):447-458. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

酒精需求缓和了未成年年轻成年饮酒者短暂动机性干预的结果。

Alcohol demand moderates brief motivational intervention outcomes in underage young adult drinkers.

机构信息

Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Brown University, United States.

Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Brown University, United States.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106044. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106044. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106044
PMID:31330464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708778/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Alcohol Purchase Task (APT), a behavioral economic measure of alcohol's reinforcing value (demand), has been used to predict the effects of Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) on alcohol use outcomes. However, it is not known whether BMI may be more or less efficacious, relative to control, among those with different levels of alcohol demand prior to treatment.

METHODS

Non college-attending young adults (N = 150) reporting past-month heavy drinking were randomized to a single in-person session of BMI or a relaxation training control (REL). The BMI included delivery of personalized feedback and focused on developing discrepancy between the young adults' goals and their current pattern of alcohol use. At baseline, participants completed assessments of alcohol use and the APT. Drinking levels were re-assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. Demand indices derived from the APT were examined as moderators of treatment effects on follow-up drinking after covarying for baseline alcohol use.

RESULTS

Two of four APT demand indices - intensity and O - moderated treatment outcomes. Relative to REL, BMI led to greater reductions in total number of drinks consumed and drinks per drinking day among participants with higher baseline alcohol demand. This association was not observed among participants with lower levels of alcohol demand.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that BMI may be particularly beneficial for those with a high reinforcing value of alcohol. The mechanism for this effect is unclear, and determining the process by which BMI confers increased benefit for these individuals is a fruitful area for future work.

摘要

简介

酒精购买任务(APT)是一种衡量酒精强化价值(需求)的行为经济学方法,已被用于预测简短动机干预(BMI)对酒精使用结果的影响。然而,在治疗前具有不同酒精需求水平的人群中,BMI 是否相对于对照更有效或更无效尚不清楚。

方法

非大学就读的年轻成年人(N=150)报告过去一个月内有重度饮酒,随机分为 BMI 单次面对面治疗组或放松训练对照组(REL)。BMI 包括提供个性化反馈,并专注于在年轻人的目标与其当前饮酒模式之间建立差异。在基线时,参与者完成了酒精使用评估和 APT。在干预后 6 周和 3 个月时重新评估饮酒水平。在协方差了基线酒精使用后,检查 APT 衍生的需求指数是否可以作为治疗对随访饮酒的影响的调节剂。

结果

四个 APT 需求指数中的两个 - 强度和 O - 调节了治疗效果。与 REL 相比,BMI 导致基线酒精需求较高的参与者的总饮酒量和饮酒日饮酒量减少更多。在酒精需求较低的参与者中,未观察到这种关联。

结论

这些结果表明,BMI 可能对酒精强化价值较高的人群特别有益。这种效果的机制尚不清楚,确定 BMI 如何为这些人带来更大的益处是未来工作的一个有前途的领域。