University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, United States.
Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States.
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
Demand curves provide an index of how reinforcing a food is. Research examining the latent structure of alcohol and tobacco reinforcement identified two underlying components of reinforcement, amplitude and persistence. No research has assessed latent structure of food reinforcement and how these factors are related to BMI.
Participants were 297 adults from two studies that completed food purchasing tasks to assess the following measures of relative reinforcing efficacy (RRE) of food: intensity (Q): purchases made when the food was free or of very minimal price, O: maximum expenditure (purchases*price), P: price point where maximum expenditure was observed, breakpoint: first price where 0 purchases are made, and demand elasticity (α): quantitative non-linear relationship between purchasing and price. Principal components analysis was used to examine the factor structure of RRE for food across samples and types of food.
Both studies revealed two factor solutions, with P, O breakpoint and α loading on factor 1 (persistence) and intensity (Q) loading on factor 2 (amplitude) across both high and low energy dense foods. Persistence reflects an aggregate measure of price sensitivity and amplitude reflects the preferred volume of consumption (how long vs. how much). The two factors accounted for between 91.7 and 95.4% of the variance in food reinforcement. Intensity for high energy dense foods predicted BMI for both studies (r = 0.18 and r = 0.22, p's < 0.05).
The latent factor structure was similar across two significantly different independent samples and across low and high energy dense snack foods. In addition, the amplitude of the demand curve, but not persistence, was related to BMI. These results suggest specific aspects of food reinforcement that can be targeted to alter food intake.
需求曲线提供了一种衡量食物强化程度的指标。研究检查了酒精和烟草强化的潜在结构,确定了强化的两个基本组成部分,即幅度和持久性。目前还没有研究评估食物强化的潜在结构以及这些因素与 BMI 的关系。
来自两项研究的 297 名成年人参与了这项研究,他们完成了食物购买任务,以评估以下衡量食物相对强化效力(RRE)的指标:强度(Q):当食物免费或价格非常低时购买的数量;O:最大支出(购买量*价格);P:观察到最大支出的价格点;断点:第一次购买量为 0 的价格;需求弹性(α):购买量和价格之间的定量非线性关系。使用主成分分析来检验样本和不同类型食物的 RRE 因子结构。
两项研究都揭示了两个因子解决方案,P、O 断点和α在因子 1(持久性)上加载,强度(Q)在因子 2(幅度)上加载,在高能量密集型和低能量密集型食物中都存在。持久性反映了价格敏感性的综合衡量标准,幅度反映了偏好的消费量(持续时间与数量)。这两个因素解释了食物强化中 91.7%至 95.4%的方差。高能量密集型食物的强度预测了两项研究的 BMI(r=0.18 和 r=0.22,p<0.05)。
潜在的因子结构在两个显著不同的独立样本中相似,并且在低能量密集型和高能量密集型零食中相似。此外,需求曲线的幅度,而不是持久性,与 BMI 相关。这些结果表明,食物强化的具体方面可以作为改变食物摄入的目标。