Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (A.G., D.M., D.H.B.).
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, and Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts (A.G.).
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 6;171(3):172-180. doi: 10.7326/M18-2806. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Persons with comprehensive health insurance use more hospital care than those who are uninsured or have high-deductible plans. Consequently, analysts generally assume that expanding coverage will increase society-wide use of inpatient services. However, a limited supply of beds might constrain this growth.
To determine how the implementations of Medicare and Medicaid (1966) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (2014) affected hospital use.
Repeated cross-sectional study.
Nationally representative surveys.
Respondents to the National Health Interview Survey (1962 to 1970) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008 to 2015).
Mean hospital discharges and days were measured, both society-wide and among subgroups defined by income, age, and health status. Changes between preexpansion and postexpansion periods were analyzed using multivariable negative binomial regression.
Overall hospital discharges averaged 12.8 per 100 persons in the 3 years before implementation of Medicare and Medicaid and 12.7 per 100 persons in the 4 years after (adjusted difference, 0.2 discharges [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.4 discharges] per 100 persons; P = 0.26). Hospital days did not change in the first 2 years after implementation but increased later. Effects differed by subpopulation: Adjusted discharges increased by 2.4 (CI, 1.7 to 3.1) per 100 persons among elderly compared with nonelderly persons (P < 0.001) and also increased among those with low incomes compared with high-income populations. For younger and higher-income persons, use decreased. Similarly, after the ACA's implementation, overall hospital use did not change: Society-wide rates of discharge were 9.4 per 100 persons before the ACA and 9.0 per 100 persons after the ACA (adjusted difference, -0.6 discharges [CI, -1.3 to 0.2 discharges] per 100 persons; P = 0.133), and hospital days were also stable. Trends differed for some subgroups, and rates decreased significantly in unadjusted (but not adjusted) analyses among persons reporting good or better health status and increased nonsignificantly among those in worse health.
Data sources relied on participant recall, surveys excluded institutionalized persons, and follow-up after the ACA was limited.
Past coverage expansions were associated with little or no change in society-wide hospital use; increases in groups who gained coverage were offset by reductions among others, suggesting that bed supply limited increases in use. Reducing coverage may merely shift care toward wealthier and healthier persons. Conversely, universal coverage is unlikely to cause a surge in hospital use if growth in hospital capacity is carefully constrained.
None.
拥有综合健康保险的人比没有保险或有高免赔额计划的人使用更多的医院护理。因此,分析人员通常认为扩大保险范围将增加全社会对住院服务的使用。然而,床位供应有限可能会限制这种增长。
确定 1966 年《医疗保险和医疗补助法案》(Medicare and Medicaid)和 2014 年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,ACA)的实施如何影响医院的使用。
重复的横断面研究。
全国代表性调查。
国家健康访谈调查(1962 年至 1970 年)和医疗支出面板调查(2008 年至 2015 年)的受访者。
在全社会范围内以及根据收入、年龄和健康状况定义的亚组中,测量平均医院出院人数和住院天数。使用多变量负二项回归分析分析扩张前和扩张后时期之间的变化。
在医疗保险和医疗补助实施前的 3 年中,平均每人每年有 12.8 次住院治疗,在实施后的 4 年中,平均每人每年有 12.7 次住院治疗(调整差异,每 100 人增加 0.2 次[95%CI,-0.1 至 0.4 次];P=0.26)。在实施后的前 2 年,住院天数没有变化,但后来增加了。效果因亚组而异:与非老年人相比,老年人每 100 人增加了 2.4(CI,1.7 至 3.1)次出院(P<0.001),而与高收入人群相比,低收入人群的出院人数也有所增加。对于年轻和高收入人群,使用量减少了。同样,ACA 实施后,整体医院使用量没有变化:ACA 实施前,出院率为每 100 人 9.4 次,ACA 实施后为每 100 人 9.0 次(调整差异,每 100 人减少 0.6 次[CI,-1.3 至 0.2 次];P=0.133),住院天数也保持稳定。一些亚组的趋势不同,在未经调整(但经调整)的分析中,报告健康状况良好或更好的人群的比率显著下降,而健康状况较差的人群的比率则略有增加。
数据来源依赖于参与者的回忆,调查排除了机构化人员,ACA 后的随访有限。
过去的覆盖范围扩大与全社会医院使用量的变化不大或没有变化有关;获得覆盖范围的人群的增加被其他人的减少所抵消,这表明床位供应限制了使用量的增加。减少覆盖范围可能只会将护理转向更富裕和更健康的人群。相反,如果仔细限制医院容量的增长,普及保险不太可能导致医院使用量的激增。
无。