Huland H, Klöppel G, Otto U, Feddersen I, Brachmann W, Hubmann H, Kaufmann J, Knipper W, Lantzius-Beninga F
Department of Urology, University of Hamburg, FRG.
Eur Urol. 1988;14(3):202-6. doi: 10.1159/000472937.
The value of various protocols of mitomycin C and adriamycin instillation for the prevention of recurrent tumors in patients whose superficial bladder tumors (TA, T1) had been removed by transurethral resection was compared in a prospective multicenter study. Three-year and short-term instillation protocols were compared with each other and with the combination of the two. Evaluation after a mean follow-up of 20 months confirmed our previous conclusion of the great value of cytostatic bladder instillation to prevent recurrent tumors and tumor progression in patients with superficial bladder carcinoma. There is no significant difference between long-term and short-term prophylaxis, but combination has achieved the best results. Similar results were obtained with adriamycin and mitomycin but adriamycin was less well tolerated.
在一项前瞻性多中心研究中,比较了丝裂霉素C和阿霉素的各种膀胱灌注方案对经尿道切除浅表性膀胱肿瘤(TA、T1)患者预防肿瘤复发的价值。将三年和短期灌注方案相互比较,并与两者联合方案进行比较。平均随访20个月后的评估证实了我们之前的结论,即细胞毒性膀胱灌注对预防浅表性膀胱癌患者的肿瘤复发和进展具有重要价值。长期和短期预防之间无显著差异,但联合方案取得了最佳效果。阿霉素和丝裂霉素得到了相似的结果,但阿霉素的耐受性较差。