• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中度至重度稳定 COPD 成年患者中,以 Discair 干粉吸入递送的 12/400-µg 福莫特罗/布地奈德单剂量组合的支气管扩张剂疗效:开放标签、单臂、IV 期试验。

Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Trial.

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Center for Drug Research and Development and Pharmacokinetic Applications (ARGEFAR), Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Oct;39(10):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00828-y.

DOI:10.1007/s40261-019-00828-y
PMID:31332649
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A patient-friendly and easy-to-use multi-dose dry powder inhaler, Discair, has been recently developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bronchodilator efficacy of a single-dose 12/400-µg formoterol plus budesonide combination as a dry powder for inhalation delivered by Discair in adult patients with moderate-to-severe, stable, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

A total of 33 male patients with moderate-to-severe, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included in this single-arm, open-label, phase IV trial. The primary efficacy parameters were the average maximum change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV, in L) and time to maximum FEV response. Absolute and percent change from baseline in FEV and forced vital capacity, maximum change and time to peak forced vital capacity response were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean post-bronchodilator FEV maximum value was significantly higher than the pre-bronchodilator baseline FEV value [1.66 (standard deviation 0.43) vs. 1.32 (standard deviation 0.35), p < 0.001], with an absolute change of 0.34 (standard deviation 0.18) and a percent change of 26.0 (standard deviation 0.14) from baseline to maximum response. The average time to peak FEV response was 3.94 h (standard deviation 2.75), while the standardized area under the response-time curve from 0 to 12 h for FEV was 2.72 (standard deviation 1.84). The FEV and forced vital capacity values recorded at each time point during the 12-h post-bronchodilator period were also significantly higher than the baseline values (p < 0.001 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed significant changes from baseline in post-bronchodilator peak and average FEV and forced vital capacity responses, indicating bronchodilator efficacy of a single-dose 12/400 µg formoterol plus budesonide dry powder formulation delivered by Discair in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03028701.

摘要

背景和目的

最近开发了一种患者友好且易于使用的多剂量干粉吸入器 Discair。本研究的目的是评估单剂量 12/400μg 福莫特罗加布地奈德联合干粉吸入器在中重度稳定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的支气管扩张作用。

方法

本项单臂、开放标签、IV 期试验共纳入 33 例男性中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。主要疗效参数为用力呼气量(FEV)的平均最大变化率和达到最大 FEV 时间。还评估了 FEV 和用力肺活量的绝对和百分比变化、最大变化和达到峰值用力肺活量时间。

结果

支气管扩张剂后 FEV 的平均最大值显著高于支气管扩张剂前的基础 FEV 值[1.66(标准差 0.43)比 1.32(标准差 0.35),p<0.001],绝对变化为 0.34(标准差 0.18),从基线到最大反应的百分比变化为 26.0(标准差 0.14)。FEV 反应的平均达峰时间为 3.94 h(标准差 2.75),而 FEV 从 0 到 12 h 的反应时间标准化面积为 2.72(标准差 1.84)。支气管扩张剂后 12 h 内每个时间点的 FEV 和用力肺活量值也明显高于基线值(p<0.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,支气管扩张剂后 FEV 和用力肺活量的峰值和平均反应均有显著变化,表明单剂量 12/400μg 福莫特罗加布地奈德干粉制剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的支气管扩张作用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT03028701。

相似文献

1
Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Trial.在中度至重度稳定 COPD 成年患者中,以 Discair 干粉吸入递送的 12/400-µg 福莫特罗/布地奈德单剂量组合的支气管扩张剂疗效:开放标签、单臂、IV 期试验。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Oct;39(10):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00828-y.
2
Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair versus HandiHaler in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者,通过Diskair与HandiHaler每日一次吸入18μg噻托溴铵的支气管扩张疗效:随机、活性药物对照、平行组、开放标签的IV期试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 22;11:2859-2867. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119114. eCollection 2016.
3
Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium/formoterol (18/12 µg once daily via a Discair inhaler), tiotropium alone (18 µg by Handihaler) or combined with formoterol (12 µg twice daily by Aerolizer) in adults with moderate-to-severe stable COPD.噻托溴铵/福莫特罗(18/12μg,每日一次通过 Discair 吸入器)、噻托溴铵单药(18μg,通过 Handihaler)或联合福莫特罗(12μg,每日两次通过 Aerolizer)在中重度稳定 COPD 成人中的支气管扩张疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2187-2196. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1654722. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD.一项关于甘罗溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗定量吸入气雾剂相对于乌美溴铵/维兰特罗干粉吸入剂治疗 COPD 的随机、双盲、双模拟研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2434-2449. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate with co-suspension delivery technology versus dual therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (KRONOS): a double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗联合混悬液给药技术三联疗法对比慢性阻塞性肺疾病(KRONOS)中的双联疗法:一项双盲、平行分组、多中心、3 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Oct;6(10):747-758. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30327-8. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
6
Budesonide/formoterol MDI with co-suspension delivery technology in COPD: the TELOS study.布地奈德/福莫特罗干粉吸入剂联合悬浮递送技术治疗 COPD:TELOS 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Sep 16;52(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01334-2018. Print 2018 Sep.
7
Efficacy of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol metered dose inhaler in patients with COPD: post-hoc analysis from the KRONOS study excluding patients with airway reversibility and high eosinophil counts.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/福莫特罗定量吸入剂治疗 COPD 患者的疗效:排除气道可逆性和高嗜酸性粒细胞计数患者的 KRONOS 研究事后分析。
Respir Res. 2021 Jun 28;22(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01773-1.
8
Efficacy and safety of four doses of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate delivered via a metered dose inhaler compared with the monocomponents in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.与单一组分相比,四剂量格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗通过定量吸入器给药治疗中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 19;13:1965-1977. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S166455. eCollection 2018.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol in one hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.布地奈德/福莫特罗单剂量氢氟烷烃压力定量吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和耐受性:一项为期1年的随机对照临床试验结果
Drugs. 2009;69(5):549-65. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969050-00004.
10
Functional respiratory imaging assessment of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate and glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhalers in patients with COPD: the value of inhaled corticosteroids.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗和格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗定量吸入器在 COPD 患者中的功能呼吸成像评估:吸入皮质类固醇的价值。
Respir Res. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01772-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler.通过思力华能倍乐装置吸入布地奈德+福莫特罗用于哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理:与都保装置相比,改善吸入技术对非计划医疗费用的潜在影响。
Respir Med. 2017 Aug;129:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.FULFIL 试验:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的每日一次三联疗法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 15;196(4):438-446. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0449OC.
3
Early efficacy of budesonide/formoterol in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD.
布地奈德/福莫特罗对中重度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的早期疗效
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 19;12:13-25. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S114209. eCollection 2017.
4
Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair versus HandiHaler in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者,通过Diskair与HandiHaler每日一次吸入18μg噻托溴铵的支气管扩张疗效:随机、活性药物对照、平行组、开放标签的IV期试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 22;11:2859-2867. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119114. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparative analysis of budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol combinations in COPD patients: findings from a real-world analysis in an Italian setting.布地奈德/福莫特罗与氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的比较分析:意大利真实世界分析结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 4;11:2749-2755. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S114554. eCollection 2016.
6
Difference in resistance to humidity between commonly used dry powder inhalers: an in vitro study.常用干粉吸入器抗湿性差异的体外研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 17;26:16053. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.53.
7
Patient-reported outcomes and considerations in the management of COPD: focus on aclidinium.慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的患者报告结局及考量:聚焦于阿地溴铵
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jan 17;9:95-104. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S55009. eCollection 2015.
8
Differences in the efficacy and safety among inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) combinations in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): Role of ICS.吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)/长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)联合用药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效和安全性差异:ICS的作用
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Feb;30:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Moving towards patient-centered medicine for COPD management: multidimensional approaches versus phenotype-based medicine--a critical view.迈向以患者为中心的慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理:多维方法与基于表型的医学——批判性观点
COPD. 2014 Sep;11(5):591-602. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.898035. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
10
Impact of patients' satisfaction with their inhalers on treatment compliance and health status in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者对吸入器的满意度对治疗依从性和健康状况的影响
Respir Med. 2014 Feb;108(2):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 2.