Suppr超能文献

麦氏真空吸引或柯氏产钳:哪一种对盆底损伤更大?

Malmström vacuum or Kielland forceps: which causes more damage to pelvic floor?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):257-263. doi: 10.1002/uog.20404.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether differences exist in the rate of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion between women who had undergone either Malmström vacuum delivery (MVD) or Kielland forceps delivery (KFD), allowing for potential confounding factors.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of nulliparous women undergoing instrumental delivery using Malmström vacuum extractor or Kielland forceps, at two hospital centers in Spain. Fetal head position (anterior, posterior or transverse) and fetal head station (low or mid) were assessed by ultrasound and digital examination, respectively. Avulsion was defined on tomographic ultrasound imaging as an abnormal insertion of the LAM in the three central slices from the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions.

RESULTS

In total, 414 patients were included in the study (212 MVD and 202 KFD). We observed a higher rate of LAM avulsion in the KFD group (KFD 49.5% vs MVD 32.5%; P = 0.001). When the results were evaluated according to fetal head position and station, we observed no differences in LAM avulsion. The crude odds ratio (OR) for the difference in avulsion between women in the KFD and MVD groups was 2.03 (95% CI, 1.36-3.03). However, when adjusted for duration of second stage of labor, fetal head circumference and fetal head station, the OR was no longer statistically significant (OR, 2.14 (95% CI, 0.95-4.85); P = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

When potential confounding factors are taken into account, the rate of LAM avulsion does not differ between women according to whether they have undergone KFD or MVD. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

确定行马尔姆斯特伦真空吸引(MVD)或基耶兰产钳(KFD)分娩的女性中,会阴肌肉(LAM)撕裂的发生率是否存在差异,同时考虑潜在的混杂因素。

方法

这是一项在西班牙两个医院中心进行的、针对使用马尔姆斯特伦真空吸引器或基耶兰产钳行器械分娩的初产妇的前瞻性观察性研究。胎儿头部位置(前位、后位或横位)和胎儿头部位置(低位或中位)分别通过超声和数字检查进行评估。在断层超声成像中,将 LAM 在最小裂孔尺寸平面的三个中央切片中的异常插入定义为撕裂。

结果

共有 414 名患者纳入本研究(MVD 组 212 例,KFD 组 202 例)。我们发现 KFD 组的 LAM 撕裂发生率更高(KFD 组 49.5% vs. MVD 组 32.5%;P=0.001)。当根据胎儿头部位置和位置评估结果时,我们没有观察到 LAM 撕裂的差异。KFD 组和 MVD 组之间撕裂差异的粗比值比(OR)为 2.03(95%CI,1.36-3.03)。然而,当调整第二产程持续时间、胎儿头围和胎儿头部位置后,OR 不再具有统计学意义(OR,2.14(95%CI,0.95-4.85);P=0.068)。

结论

当考虑潜在混杂因素时,行 KFD 或 MVD 的女性中 LAM 撕裂的发生率并无差异。版权所有©2019ISUOG。由约翰威立父子有限公司出版。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验