Verma Madhur, Rajput Meena, Kishore Kamal, Kathirvel Soundappan
Department of Community Medicine, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):2095-2100. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_257_19.
International Obesity Task Force proposed lower body mass index (BMI) cut-off values for defining overweight and obesity in Asian population. However, there is an absence of unanimity regarding the definition of overweight and obesity that is confusing while estimating disease burden, resource allocation, and priority setting. Therefore, the primary aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of overweight and obesity and its predictors as per different criteria (WHO criteria, Modified Asian criteria of BMI classification and BF% estimation by bioelectric impedance analysis technique). The secondary aim was to assess the concordance of overweight and obesity as diagnosed using these three methods.
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural area of Rohtak, north India over a period of 1 year with a sample size of 1080. Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, blood pressure, body fat % analysis were recorded using standard protocols.
The prevalence of overweight and obesity were observed to be 49.62% ( = 536) as per the modified criteria for the Asian Indians (BMI ≥23 kg/m) and 34.62% ( = 374) according to WHO criteria (BMI ≥25 kg/m). A total of 18.3% of the study population were hypertensive. Modified criteria of BMI classification for Asian Indians had high sensitivity (67%) as compared to WHO criteria (55%) in predicting, diagnosing hypertension, and resembled sensitivity estimate obtained through direct body fat percentage estimation (69%).
Modified criteria of overweight and obesity classification are better in terms of reducing comorbid dysmetabolic conditions, as exemplified by hypertension.
国际肥胖特别工作组提出了针对亚洲人群超重和肥胖定义的较低体重指数(BMI)临界值。然而,对于超重和肥胖的定义尚未达成一致,这在估计疾病负担、资源分配和确定优先事项时造成了混乱。因此,本研究的主要目的是根据不同标准(世界卫生组织标准、亚洲BMI分类修正标准以及通过生物电阻抗分析技术估算体脂百分比)评估超重和肥胖的患病率及其预测因素。次要目的是评估使用这三种方法诊断的超重和肥胖的一致性。
在印度北部罗塔克的一个农村地区进行了一项基于社区的横断面研究,为期1年,样本量为1080。使用标准方案记录包括身高、体重、血压、体脂百分比分析在内的人体测量数据。
根据亚洲印度人的修正标准(BMI≥23kg/m²),超重和肥胖的患病率为49.62%(n = 536),而根据世界卫生组织标准(BMI≥25kg/m²)为34.62%(n = 374)。共有18.3%的研究人群患有高血压。在预测和诊断高血压方面,亚洲印度人的BMI分类修正标准的敏感性较高(67%),高于世界卫生组织标准(55%),并且与通过直接体脂百分比估计获得的敏感性估计值(69%)相似。
超重和肥胖分类的修正标准在减少合并代谢紊乱状况方面表现更好,如高血压所示。