Suppr超能文献

聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗患者的双联抗血小板治疗策略与临床结局。

Dual antiplatelet therapy strategies and clinical outcomes in patients treated with polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents.

机构信息

Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2020 Feb 7;15(15):e1358-e1365. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00450.

Abstract

AIMS

A large trial established the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) with a one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We aimed to evaluate the real-world patterns of indications, DAPT strategies and outcomes for the PF-BES following this evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CHANCE is a multicentre registry including all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one PF-BES. The reasons for the PF-BES PCI and planned antithrombotic regimens were collected. Primary outcomes were the 390-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient-oriented and device-oriented composite endpoints (POCE: death, myocardial infarction [MI] or target vessel revascularisation [TVR]; DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR]). Between January 2016 and July 2018, 858 patients (age 74±10 years, 64.6% male, 58.7% acute coronary syndrome presentation) underwent PF-BES PCI. The main reasons for the physicians' choice of PF-BES reflected a perceived HBR in 77.7% of patients. One-month DAPT was planned in 40.3% of patients. At 390-day follow-up (median 340 days, interquartile range: 187-390 days), the estimated incidence of POCE was 13.1% (any MI 3.7%, any TVR 3.4%) and of DOCE was 7.1% (TV-MI 3.6%, ID-TLR 1.4%), while the 390-day estimate of any bleeding event was 11.1% (BARC 3-5 bleeding 3.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large all-comers registry, PF-BES was used mostly in HBR patients, frequently followed by a very short DAPT regimen. The reported outcomes suggest a favourable safety and efficacy profile for the PF-BES in a real-world clinical setting. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03622203.

摘要

目的

一项大型试验确立了新型无聚合物生物可吸收依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架(PF-BES)在高出血风险(HBR)患者中采用一个月双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)方案的有利临床特征。我们旨在评估在该证据之后,PF-BES 的适应证、DAPT 策略和结果的真实世界模式。

方法和结果

CHANCE 是一项多中心注册研究,纳入了所有接受至少一枚 PF-BES 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。收集了进行 PF-BES PCI 的原因和计划的抗血栓形成方案。主要结局是患者导向和器械导向复合终点(POCE:死亡、心肌梗死[MI]或靶血管血运重建[TVR];DOCE:心源性死亡、靶血管 MI 或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建[ID-TLR])的 390 天 Kaplan-Meier 估计值。2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月,858 例患者(年龄 74±10 岁,64.6%为男性,58.7%为急性冠状动脉综合征)接受了 PF-BES PCI。医生选择 PF-BES 的主要原因反映了 77.7%患者的 HBR。计划在 1 个月时进行 DAPT 的患者占 40.3%。在 390 天随访(中位数 340 天,四分位距 187-390 天)时,POCE 的估计发生率为 13.1%(任何 MI 为 3.7%,任何 TVR 为 3.4%),DOCE 的发生率为 7.1%(TV-MI 为 3.6%,ID-TLR 为 1.4%),而 390 天的任何出血事件发生率为 11.1%(BARC 3-5 出血 3.0%)。

结论

在一项大型所有患者注册研究中,PF-BES 主要用于 HBR 患者,通常随后采用非常短的 DAPT 方案。报告的结果表明,在真实临床环境中,PF-BES 具有良好的安全性和疗效特征。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT03622203。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验