• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于血液的蛋白检测在初级保健中对诊断性结肠镜检查转介高危结直肠癌患者的临床应用。

Clinical Utility of a Blood-based Protein Assay on Diagnostic Colonoscopy Referrals for Elevated-risk Colorectal Cancer Patients in Primary Care.

机构信息

University of California, College of Medicine, San Francisco.

University of California, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;42(9):687-691. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000578.

DOI:10.1097/COC.0000000000000578
PMID:31335349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopies are effective in finding early stage colorectal cancer (CRC), which when found in a timely manner, dramatically improve survival rates. A significant number of at-risk patients are still not screened. We investigated the utility of a blood-based protein assay to assess for CRC in patients with elevated risk on the quality of preventive care delivered by board-certified primary care physicians (PCPs) in the United States.

METHODS

We report on the results of a 3-part, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial. Part 1 assessed physicians' ability to identify simulated patients at risk for CRC and found PCPs missed colonoscopy referrals for high-risk patients ~40% of the time. Part 2 randomized PCPs into control and intervention arms and demonstrated that a novel blood-based protein assay increased referral rates for a diagnostic colonoscopy when caring for simulated patients. Part 3, reported herein, compares real-world colonoscopy rates of actual patients cared for by control versus intervention physicians. Part 3 was executed to confirm whether the use of the assay demonstrated the same utility in their real world, high-risk patients as found in part 2 using simulated patients.

RESULTS

In the simulations, physicians with access to the assay were significantly more likely to order diagnostic colonoscopies. Similarly, in real-world practice, patients were also more likely to be referred for a diagnostic colonoscopy (odds ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-17.57).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in CRC risk, as indicated by the assay in simulated and real-life patients, was associated with a higher likelihood of appropriate patients being referred to diagnostic colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查可有效发现早期结直肠癌(CRC),及时发现可显著提高生存率。仍有相当数量的高危患者未接受筛查。我们研究了一种基于血液的蛋白检测在评估美国经委员会认证的初级保健医生(PCP)提供的预防性护理质量高的风险患者 CRC 中的效用。

方法

我们报告了一项 3 部分、纵向、随机对照试验的结果。第 1 部分评估了医生识别模拟 CRC 高危患者的能力,发现 PCP 大约 40%的时间错过了高危患者的结肠镜检查转诊。第 2 部分将 PCP 随机分配到对照组和干预组,结果表明,新型血液蛋白检测在模拟患者护理中增加了诊断性结肠镜检查的转诊率。本文报告的第 3 部分比较了对照组和干预组医生实际护理的实际患者的结肠镜检查率。第 3 部分旨在确认在真实世界中,高危患者中使用该检测是否与第 2 部分中使用模拟患者时一样具有相同的效用。

结果

在模拟中,可获得检测的医生更有可能进行诊断性结肠镜检查。同样,在实际实践中,患者也更有可能被转介进行诊断性结肠镜检查(比值比,4.57;95%置信区间,1.19-17.57)。

结论

正如检测在模拟和现实生活中的患者中所表明的那样,CRC 风险的增加与更有可能将适当的患者转介进行诊断性结肠镜检查相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical Utility of a Blood-based Protein Assay on Diagnostic Colonoscopy Referrals for Elevated-risk Colorectal Cancer Patients in Primary Care.基于血液的蛋白检测在初级保健中对诊断性结肠镜检查转介高危结直肠癌患者的临床应用。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;42(9):687-691. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000578.
2
Clinical utility of a blood-based protein assay to increase screening of elevated-risk patients for colorectal cancer in the primary care setting.一种基于血液的蛋白质检测在基层医疗环境中增加对结直肠癌高危患者筛查的临床效用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2301-2307. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2469-4. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Variation in colorectal cancer testing between primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.瑞士的一项横断面研究:初级保健医生之间的结直肠癌检测差异。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Sep;64(7):1075-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01259-4. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
4
Discrepancies and misconceptions of perceived colorectal cancer screening barriers between primary health professionals and unscreened population. A comparative study in Greece.初级卫生保健专业人员与未接受筛查人群对结直肠癌筛查障碍的认知差异和误解:希腊的一项比较研究
J BUON. 2018 Dec;23(7):67-76.
5
Training primary care physicians to offer their patients faecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening on an equal basis: a pilot intervention with before-after and parallel group surveys.培训初级保健医生,使其能平等地为患者提供粪便潜血检测和结肠镜检查以进行结直肠癌筛查:一项采用前后对照和并行组调查的试点干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e011086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011086.
6
Factors Affecting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Physician Practices in Ukraine.影响乌克兰初级保健医生实践中结直肠癌筛查的因素。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Aug;10:e2400053. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00053.
7
Inter-physician variation in follow-up colonoscopies after screening colonoscopy.不同医生对筛查性结肠镜检查后进行结肠镜随访的差异。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069312. Print 2013.
8
Possible missed opportunities for diagnosing colorectal cancer in Dutch primary care: a multimethods approach.荷兰初级保健中结直肠癌诊断的可能错失机会:一种多方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan;68(666):e54-e62. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693905. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州初级保健实践干预措施提高结直肠癌筛查效果的研究。
Prev Med. 2014 Jan;58:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.韩国息肉切除术后结肠镜监测间隔的指南依从性:一项全国性调查结果。
Gut Liver. 2018 Jul 15;12(4):426-432. doi: 10.5009/gnl17403.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.一种评估2型糖尿病心血管疾病风险的新型检测方法的临床效用:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Jul 13;15(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w.
2
Randomized Trial to Improve Primary Care Patient Management and Patient Outcomes Using a Drug-Drug Interaction Test: Confirmation of the DECART Simulated Patient Clinical Utility Trial Results.使用药物相互作用测试改善初级保健患者管理和患者结局的随机试验:DECART模拟患者临床效用试验结果的确认
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;11(7):1266. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071266.