From the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Cancer J. 2019 Jul/Aug;25(4):287-295. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000390.
Advances in high-throughput technologies have yielded impressive insights into the molecular biology behind cancers, resulting in a powerful ally for the development of biomarkers-selected clinical trials, which are critical for translating our genomic knowledge into clinically meaningful outcomes. "Basket studies" or histology-agnostic clinical trials in biomarker-defined populations represent an important research strategy to continue making progress in this field. The recent accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approvals of anti-programmed death 1 pembrolizumab and nivolumab for mismatch repair-deficient cancers, as well as larotrectinib for cancers carrying TRK fusions, support the fundamental premise that some cancers may be best classified based on molecular phenotype and not site of origin. The studies that were conducted showing the efficacy of this approach serve as validation of the basket study paradigm. In the field of immune oncology, the advent of tumor agnostic strategies represents an important step toward discovering biomarkers of response and elucidating mechanisms of treatment efficacy and resistance across a variety of cancer types. We present a review and discussion of the progress in biomarker-defined approaches to drug development in immunology.
高通量技术的进步为癌症的分子生物学研究提供了令人瞩目的见解,为生物标志物选择临床试验的发展提供了有力的支持,这对于将我们的基因组知识转化为具有临床意义的结果至关重要。在生物标志物定义的人群中进行“篮子研究”或组织学不可知的临床试验是继续在这一领域取得进展的重要研究策略。最近,美国食品和药物管理局加速批准抗程序性死亡 1 派姆单抗和纳武单抗用于错配修复缺陷型癌症,以及 larotrectinib 用于携带 TRK 融合的癌症,支持了这样一个基本前提,即某些癌症可能最好根据分子表型而不是起源部位进行分类。证明这种方法有效性的研究为篮子研究范例提供了验证。在肿瘤免疫领域,肿瘤不可知策略的出现是朝着发现反应生物标志物以及阐明各种癌症类型的治疗效果和耐药机制迈出的重要一步。我们对免疫学中基于生物标志物的药物开发方法的进展进行了综述和讨论。