• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胸外科学会 10 年认证维持考试提高并验证了知识获取。

American Board of Thoracic Surgery 10-Year Maintenance of Certification Exam Improves and Validates Knowledge Acquisition.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1895-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.074. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.074
PMID:31336069
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous "high-stakes" examinations by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery (ABTS) required remote testing, were noneducational, and were not tailored to individual practices. Given the ABTS mission of public safety and diplomate education, the ABTS Maintenance of Certification (MOC) examination was revised in 2015 to improve the educational experience and validate knowledge acquired.

METHODS

The ABTS-MOC Committee developed a web-based, secure examination tailored to the specialty-specific practice profile (cardiac, general thoracic, cardiothoracic, congenital) of the individual surgeon. After an initial answer to each question, an educational critique was reviewed before returning to the initial question and logging a second (final) response. Intraexam learning was assessed by comparing scores before and after reading the critique. Diplomate feedback was obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 988 diplomates completed the 10-year MOC examination between 2015 and 2017. Substantive learning was demonstrated with an 18%, 17%, 20%, and 9% improvement in cardiac, general thoracic, cardiothoracic, and congenital final scores, respectively. This improvement was most notable among diplomates with the lowest initial scores. Fewer diplomates failed the new exam (<1% vs 2.3%). Diplomate postexam survey highlighted marked improvements in clinical relevance (35% vs 78%), convenience (37% vs 78%), and learning (15% vs 45%). Over 80% acknowledged educational value, and 97% preferred the new format.

CONCLUSIONS

The new MOC process demonstrates increased knowledge acquisition through a convenient, secure, web-based practice-focused examination. This approach provides feedback, identifies baseline knowledge gaps for individual diplomates, and validates new knowledge attained.

摘要

背景

美国胸外科委员会(ABTS)之前的“高风险”考试需要远程测试,不具有教育意义,也不针对个人实践进行调整。鉴于 ABTS 的公共安全和理事教育使命,ABTS 维持认证(MOC)考试于 2015 年进行了修订,以提高教育体验并验证所获得的知识。

方法

ABTS-MOC 委员会开发了一种基于网络的、安全的考试,针对每位外科医生的专业特定实践情况(心脏、普通胸外科、心胸外科、先天性)进行定制。在回答每个问题的初始答案后,先审查教育评论,然后再回到初始问题并记录第二个(最终)答案。通过比较阅读评论前后的分数来评估考试内的学习情况。还获得了理事的反馈。

结果

共有 988 名理事在 2015 年至 2017 年期间完成了 10 年的 MOC 考试。在心脏、普通胸外科、心胸外科和先天性的最终分数中,分别有 18%、17%、20%和 9%的实质性提高,证明了实质性的学习。这种提高在初始分数最低的理事中最为显著。新考试不及格的理事人数较少(<1%对 2.3%)。理事考试后调查突出显示了临床相关性(35%对 78%)、便利性(37%对 78%)和学习(15%对 45%)的显著提高。超过 80%的人承认了教育价值,97%的人更喜欢新格式。

结论

新的 MOC 流程通过方便、安全的基于网络的注重实践的考试展示了知识的获取增加。这种方法提供反馈,确定个人理事的基准知识差距,并验证新获得的知识。

相似文献

1
American Board of Thoracic Surgery 10-Year Maintenance of Certification Exam Improves and Validates Knowledge Acquisition.美国胸外科学会 10 年认证维持考试提高并验证了知识获取。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1895-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.074. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
The American Board of Radiology Perspective on Maintenance of Certification: Part IV: Practice quality improvement in radiologic physics.美国放射学会关于继续认证的观点:第四部分:放射物理学中的实践质量改进
Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4158-63. doi: 10.1118/1.2786860.
3
American Board of Thoracic Surgery examination: fewer graduates, more failures.美国胸外科委员会考试:毕业生减少,通过率降低。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1464-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
4
Perceived value of Board certification and the Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program (MOCA®).麻醉学委员会认证和持续专业发展认证项目(MOCA®)的认知价值。
J Clin Anesth. 2013 Feb;25(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.09.001.
5
Performance of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Candidates on the Subspecialty Board Certification Examination from 2003 to 2015.2003 年至 2015 年小儿康复医学候选人在专科委员会认证考试中的表现。
PM R. 2018 Apr;10(4):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Training, examination, and certification of a thoracic surgeon. A position paper of the American Board of Thoracic Surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Jun;79(6):937-9.
7
The American Board of Thoracic Surgery: update.美国胸外科委员会:最新情况
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;143(3):519-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.030.
8
Predictors of Performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Maintenance of Certification Examination.美国物理医学与康复委员会认证维持考试成绩的预测因素
PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1361-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
9
The American Board of Thoracic Surgery: update.美国胸外科委员会:最新情况
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1190-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.008.
10
Assessment of the American Board of Ophthalmology's Maintenance of Certification Part 4 (Improvement in Medical Practice).美国眼科学会继续医学认证第4部分(医疗实践改进)评估
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 1;134(9):967-74. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1848.