• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多模态神经生理监测可降低颈动脉内膜切除术期间的分流发生率。

Multimodal Neurophysiological Monitoring Reduces Shunt Incidence during Carotid Endarterectomy.

作者信息

Leopardi Marco, Musilli Aldo, Piccolo Elisa, Marrelli Alfonso, Martinazzo Claudio, Maggipinto Annamaria, Ventura Marco

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Vascular Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Vascular Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.017
PMID:31336166
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of shunt during carotid surgery is controversial. Different experiences are found in literature with transcranial Doppler (TCD), electroencephalogram (EEG), stump pressure (SP), and somatosensorial evoked potentials (SSEP).

METHODS

We realized a retrospective analysis of patients treated with carotid endarterectomy in our unit in the last 2 years. We use several cerebral monitoring: until 2017 we preferred SP + TCD, and, if not available, EEG. Since 2017 we introduced EEG with SSEP, always in association with SP. We analyzed those 2 groups of patients: before and after introduction of EEG with SSEP.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to December 2018 we performed 156 carotid revascularizations. In the first group of 93 patients treated under combined SP + TCD (or EEG), we observed 1 stroke (1.1%) and 2 transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (2.1%); we selectively used a shunt in 21 cases (22.5%). In the second group, 63 patients had an SP + EEG with SSEP monitoring; we observed 1 stroke (1.5%) and 2 TIAs (3.1%), a shunt was necessary in 12 cases (12.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, EEG with SSEP represents an effective parameter to indicate shunt positioning, as we were able to reduce its use, with the same incidence of stroke and TIA.

摘要

背景

颈动脉手术中分流术的使用存在争议。文献中关于经颅多普勒(TCD)、脑电图(EEG)、残端压力(SP)和体感诱发电位(SSEP)有不同的经验。

方法

我们对本单位过去2年接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们采用了几种脑监测方法:直到2017年,我们更倾向于使用SP + TCD,如果无法使用,则使用EEG。自2017年以来,我们引入了EEG与SSEP联合使用,且始终与SP联合。我们分析了这两组患者:引入EEG与SSEP之前和之后的患者。

结果

2016年1月至2018年12月,我们进行了156例颈动脉血运重建术。在第一组93例接受SP + TCD(或EEG)联合治疗的患者中,我们观察到1例中风(1.1%)和2例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)(2.1%);我们在21例(22.5%)患者中选择性地使用了分流术。在第二组中,63例患者接受了SP + EEG与SSEP监测;我们观察到1例中风(1.5%)和2例TIA(3.1%),12例(12.9%)患者需要使用分流术。

结论

根据我们的经验,EEG与SSEP是指示分流术定位的有效参数,因为我们能够减少其使用,同时中风和TIA的发生率相同。

相似文献

1
Multimodal Neurophysiological Monitoring Reduces Shunt Incidence during Carotid Endarterectomy.多模态神经生理监测可降低颈动脉内膜切除术期间的分流发生率。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
2
Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.使用脑电图和体感诱发电位预测颈动脉内膜切除术期间夹闭引起的术中监测变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.064. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Cerebral oximetry does not correlate with electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials in determining the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy.在颈动脉内膜切除术期间,脑血氧饱和度在确定是否需要分流方面与脑电图和体感诱发电位不相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.065. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
4
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.颈动脉内膜切除术期间的体感诱发电位和脑电图可预测晚期中风,但不能预测死亡。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.07.064. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Shunting during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术时的转流
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1502-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
6
Continuous intraoperative monitoring of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy. A comparison of the two methods to detect cerebral ischemia.颈动脉内膜切除术期间大脑中动脉血流速度和脑电图的术中连续监测。两种检测脑缺血方法的比较。
Stroke. 1997 Jul;28(7):1345-50. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.7.1345.
7
Intraoperative Neurophysiology and Transcranial Doppler for Detection of Cerebral Ischemia and Hyperperfusion During Carotid Endarterectomy.术中神经生理学和经颅多普勒超声在颈动脉内膜切除术期间检测脑缺血和过度灌注。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;154:e245-e253. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Near-infrared spectroscopy to indicate selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy.近红外光谱技术指示颈动脉内膜切除术时选择性分流的应用。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
9
Prospective evaluation of electroencephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients.对314例清醒患者连续进行颈动脉内膜切除术期间的脑电图、颈动脉残端压力和神经学变化进行前瞻性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):511-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.035. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
10
Predictors of shunt during carotid endarterectomy with routine electroencephalography monitoring.常规脑电图监测下行颈动脉内膜切除术时分流的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jun;49(6):1374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.206.