School of Environment, Beijing Key Laboratory for Emerging Organic Contaminants Control, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Beijing, 100084, China.
Beijing Guohuan Tsinghua Environmental Engineering Design & Research Institute Co.,Ltd, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2019 Dec 15;380:120888. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120888. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
This study evaluated the prediction of emerging contaminant (EC) removal during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation by chemical kinetic models. Six ECs with differing ozone reactivity were spiked in a synthetic water and a groundwater, then treated by conventional ozonation and heterogeneous catalytic ozonation with α- or β-MnO catalysts. Results show that catalysts did not considerably influence the removal of ECs with high and intermediate ozone reactivity (diclofenac, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate), but enhanced the removal efficiencies of ECs with low ozone reactivity (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, clofibric acid, and ibuprofen) to varied extent (˜10-30%). The removal efficiencies of ECs could be reasonably predicted using chemical kinetic models based on the ozone (O) and hydroxyl radical (OH) rate constants of ECs, pseudo-first-order rate constants observed for EC adsorption on the MnO catalysts, and O and OH exposures observed for catalytic ozonation. Furthermore, the model reveals that ECs are removed mainly by O and/or •OH oxidation during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation, while adsorption of ECs on catalysts contributes negligibly. Therefore, the removal efficiencies of ECs could be satisfactorily predicted using a simplified model based only on the O and OH rate constant and the O and OH exposures.
本研究通过化学动力学模型评估了在多相催化臭氧化过程中新兴污染物(EC)去除的预测。将具有不同臭氧反应性的六种 EC 添加到合成水中和地下水中,然后通过常规臭氧化和α-或β-MnO 催化剂的多相催化臭氧化进行处理。结果表明,催化剂对高和中等臭氧反应性(双氯芬酸、吉非贝齐和非诺贝特)的 EC 去除没有显著影响,但在不同程度上提高了低臭氧反应性(2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸、氯贝酸和布洛芬)的去除效率(约 10-30%)。使用基于 EC 的臭氧(O)和羟基自由基(OH)反应速率常数、MnO 催化剂上 EC 吸附的拟一级速率常数以及催化臭氧化中观察到的 O 和 OH 暴露的化学动力学模型,可以合理地预测 EC 的去除效率。此外,该模型表明,在多相催化臭氧化过程中,EC 主要通过 O 和/或•OH 氧化去除,而 EC 在催化剂上的吸附作用可以忽略不计。因此,使用仅基于 O 和 OH 速率常数以及 O 和 OH 暴露的简化模型可以令人满意地预测 EC 的去除效率。