• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多根中央导管同时留置对中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率的影响。

Impact of multiple concurrent central lines on central-line-associated bloodstream infection rates.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine,Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta,Georgia.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine,Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta,Georgia.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1019-1023. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.180. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.180
PMID:31337455
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current methodology for calculating central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates, used for pay-for-performance measures, does not account for multiple concurrent central lines.

OBJECTIVE

To compare CLABSI rates using standard National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) denominators to rates accounting for multiple concurrent central lines.

DESIGN

Descriptive analysis and retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

We identified all adult patients with central lines at 2 academic medical centers over an 18-month period. CLABSI rates were calculated for intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICUs using the standard NHSN methodology and denominator (a patient could only have 1 central-line day for a given patient day) and a modified denominator (number of central lines in 1 patient in 1 day count as number of line days). We also compared characteristics of patients with and without multiple concurrent central lines.

RESULTS

Among 18,521 hospital admissions, there were 156,574 central-line days and 239 CLABSIs (ICU, 105; non-ICU, 134). Our modified denominator reduced CLABSI rates by 25% in ICUs (1.95 vs 1.47 per 1,000 line days) and 6% (1.30 vs 1.22 per 1,000 line days) in non-ICUs. Patients with multiple concurrent central lines were more likely to be in an ICU, to have a longer admission, to have a dialysis catheter, and to have a CLABSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the number of central lines as the denominator decreased CLABSI rates in ICUs by 25%. The presence of multiple concurrent central lines may be a marker of severity of illness. The risk of CLABSI per lumen of a central line is similar in ICUs compared to wards.

摘要

背景

目前用于绩效付费措施的中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSI)率计算方法没有考虑多个同时存在的中心静脉导管。

目的

比较使用标准国家医疗保健安全网络(NHSN)分母和考虑多个同时存在的中心静脉导管的 CLABSI 率。

设计

描述性分析和回顾性队列分析。

方法

我们在 2 所学术医疗中心确定了 18 个月内所有存在中心静脉导管的成年患者。使用 NHSN 标准方法和分母(患者在给定的患者日只能有 1 个中心静脉导管日)以及修改后的分母(1 天内 1 名患者的中心静脉导管数计为导管日数)计算 ICU 和非 ICU 的 CLABSI 率。我们还比较了同时存在多个中心静脉导管的患者和没有同时存在多个中心静脉导管的患者的特征。

结果

在 18521 例住院患者中,有 156574 个中心静脉导管日和 239 例 CLABSI(ICU,105 例;非 ICU,134 例)。我们的修改后的分母使 ICU 的 CLABSI 率降低了 25%(每 1000 个导管日为 1.95 比 1.47),非 ICU 降低了 6%(每 1000 个导管日为 1.30 比 1.22)。同时存在多个中心静脉导管的患者更有可能在 ICU,住院时间更长,有透析导管,并且有 CLABSI。

结论

使用中心静脉导管数作为分母使 ICU 的 CLABSI 率降低了 25%。多个同时存在的中心静脉导管可能是疾病严重程度的标志。与病房相比,ICU 中每个中心静脉导管管腔的 CLABSI 风险相似。

相似文献

1
Impact of multiple concurrent central lines on central-line-associated bloodstream infection rates.多根中央导管同时留置对中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1019-1023. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.180. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009.生命体征:中心静脉导管相关血流感染——美国,2001 年、2008 年和 2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Mar 4;60(8):243-8.
3
Central line-associated bloodstream infections in non-ICU inpatient wards: a 2-year analysis.非重症监护病房住院患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染:一项为期2年的分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):424-30. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.86.
4
The descriptive epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infection among patients in non-intensive care unit settings.非重症监护病房环境下中心静脉导管相关血流感染的描述性流行病学。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):164-8. doi: 10.1086/674856. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
5
Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Québec Intensive Care Units: Results from the Provincial Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance Program (SPIN).魁北克重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染:省级医疗相关感染监测项目(SPIN)的结果
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1186-94. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.150. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Emergency Department Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) Incidence in the Era of Prevention Practices.预防措施时代急诊科中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1048-55. doi: 10.1111/acem.12744.
7
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.
8
Multinational prospective cohort study of incidence and risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections over 18 years in 281 ICUs of 9 Asian countries.亚洲 9 国 281 家 ICU 18 年多来中心静脉相关血流感染发生率及危险因素的跨国前瞻性队列研究。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1508-1518. doi: 10.1177/11297298231169542. Epub 2023 May 7.
9
Pathogens causing central-line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals-United States, 2011-2017.2011 - 2017年美国急症医院中导致中心静脉导管相关血流感染的病原体
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):313-319. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.303. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Multimodal interventions for bundle implementation to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units in a teaching hospital in Taiwan, 2009-2013.2009-2013 年,在台湾一所教学医院的成人重症监护病房,采用多种模式干预措施实施集束化方案以降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染率。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Oct;51(5):644-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in critical care: understanding incidence, and risk factors in Palestine.重症监护中的中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI):了解巴勒斯坦的发病率及危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10855-0.
2
Incidence, Compliance, and Risk Factor Associated with Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients: A Multicenter Study in an Upper Middle-Income Country.重症监护病房(ICU)患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率、依从性及危险因素:一个中高收入国家的多中心研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;14(3):271. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030271.
3
Central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with COVID-19.
COVID-19 相关中心静脉导管相关性血流感染。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Jul 29;32:e4236. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7007.4236. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.