Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia;
Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia.
Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2759. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Our objective for this study was to explore the experiences of faculty in academic pediatrics who are underrepresented minorities (URMs) at 2 urban medical centers, in particular, the experiences that influenced their pursuit of academic pediatrics.
Three focus groups were conducted in 2016 with URM faculty from Howard University College of Medicine and Children's National Health System to explore how they were influenced to pursue academic pediatrics. Ten 1-on-1 interviews were also conducted in 2017 with URM faculty at Children's National Health System. Focus groups were coded and analyzed by the research team using standard qualitative methods. The 1-on-1 interviews were coded and analyzed by the primary investigator and verified by members of the research team.
A total of 25 faculty participated in the study (15 in the focus groups and 10 in individual interviews). Eighteen of the faculty were women and 7 were men. Findings revealed that mentorship, family, and community influenced participants' career choices. Barriers for URMs in academic pediatrics included (1) lack of other URMs in leadership positions, (2) few URMs practicing academic pediatrics, and (3) the impact of racism and gender and implicit bias in the medical field.
Mentorship and family are major influences on why URMs become academic pediatricians. Lack of URMs in leadership positions, racism, gender bias, and implicit bias are barriers for URMs in academic pediatrics. More research should be conducted on ways to enhance the experience of URMs and to reduce barriers in academia.
本研究旨在探索在 2 所城市医学中心任职的少数族裔(URM)学术儿科学教师的经历,特别是影响他们从事学术儿科学的经历。
2016 年,我们对霍华德大学医学院和儿童国家卫生系统的 URM 教师进行了 3 次焦点小组讨论,以探讨他们是如何受到影响而从事学术儿科学的。2017 年,我们还对儿童国家卫生系统的 URM 教师进行了 10 次 1 对 1 的访谈。研究小组使用标准的定性方法对焦点小组进行编码和分析。主要调查员对 1 对 1 的访谈进行编码和分析,并由研究小组成员进行验证。
共有 25 名教师参加了这项研究(15 名参加了焦点小组,10 名参加了个人访谈)。其中 18 名教师为女性,7 名为男性。研究结果表明,指导、家庭和社区影响了参与者的职业选择。学术儿科学领域 URM 面临的障碍包括:(1)领导层缺乏其他 URM,(2)从事学术儿科学的 URM 人数较少,(3)种族主义、性别和医学领域内的隐性偏见的影响。
指导和家庭是 URM 成为学术儿科医生的主要影响因素。领导层缺乏 URM、种族主义、性别偏见和隐性偏见是 URM 从事学术儿科学的障碍。应开展更多研究,探讨如何增强 URM 的体验并减少学术界的障碍。