Tschakert Kai Florian, Ngamsuriyaroj Sudsanguan
Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Heliyon. 2019 Jun 28;5(6):e02010. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02010. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Phishing is a primary vector used in cyber-attacks, and current technical measures are not sufficient to reduce their success to an acceptable level. Empowering users to identify phishing emails is crucial; thus, anti-phishing training is essential. We investigate participant phishing susceptibility in a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design to determine if instructor-led classroom training, in addition to a multiple approach video-, game-, and text-based training package, offers a significant difference in susceptibility reduction compared with the absence of classroom training. The results suggest an insignificant improvement in reducing phishing susceptibility by incorporating classroom training. Furthermore, we observe a significant preference from the participants for one training method (i.e., classroom training) only if a decision for one particular method was required.
网络钓鱼是网络攻击中使用的主要手段,目前的技术措施不足以将其成功率降低到可接受的水平。让用户能够识别网络钓鱼邮件至关重要;因此,反钓鱼培训必不可少。我们采用2×2混合因子设计来研究参与者对网络钓鱼的易感性,以确定除了基于视频、游戏和文本的多种方式培训包之外,由教师主导的课堂培训与没有课堂培训相比,在降低易感性方面是否有显著差异。结果表明,纳入课堂培训在降低网络钓鱼易感性方面的改善不显著。此外,我们观察到,只有在需要对一种特定方法做出决定时,参与者才会对一种培训方法(即课堂培训)表现出明显的偏好。