Teitelbaum Alexander, Kodesh Arad
Harefuah. 2019 Jul;158(7):453-457.
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI AP) were mainly developed with the intention to improve adherence to treatment in schizophrenia patients and to reduce the high rates of relapses and re-hospitalizations due to treatment discontinuation. Several studies comparing LAI AP with oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia have been performed, in which RCTs (considered to be the 'gold standard' for clinical trial design) generally show no benefit for LAI AP over oral drugs, whereas observational studies do. The more pragmatic the study design, the more likely it is to show a benefit for LAI AP versus oral therapy. Seeing that the percentage of patients who are currently being treated with LAI AP is far from the percentage of non-adherent patients, it can be argued that LAI AP are significantly underused. LAI AP formulations of antipsychotics have traditionally been used for those patients with schizophrenia with the most severe symptoms, poorest compliance, most hospitalizations, and poorest outcomes, namely at the latter stages of their illness. However, an increasing number of authors suggest that early-phase patients may have the most to gain from LAI AP, at a time when their disorder is most treatable and when avoidance of recurrences and re-hospitalizations may lead to the greatest benefits. To prove the advantage of LAI AP versus oral antipsychotics, there has been an evolution to a new type of clinical trial design that combines some of the best features of both naturalistic "real life" studies and RCTs, namely pragmatic RCT. Currently, there is an ongoing trial in Israel and European countries (the EULAST study) that is an example of this kind of "new" clinical trial design. EULAST is a pragmatic randomized open label cohort study that includes a naturalistic type of follow-up among schizophrenic patients who are early in the disease course. Hopefully, it will dispel doubts concerning the advantages of LAI AP versus oral antipsychotics and will help clinicians to optimize patient's outcomes.
长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAI AP)的研发主要目的是提高精神分裂症患者的治疗依从性,并降低因停药导致的高复发率和再次住院率。已经开展了多项在精神分裂症患者中将LAI AP与口服抗精神病药物进行比较的研究,其中随机对照试验(RCT,被认为是临床试验设计的“金标准”)通常显示LAI AP并不优于口服药物,而观察性研究则显示其有优势。研究设计越务实,就越有可能显示出LAI AP相对于口服治疗的优势。鉴于目前接受LAI AP治疗的患者比例远低于不依从患者的比例,可以认为LAI AP的使用严重不足。抗精神病药物的LAI AP制剂传统上用于那些症状最严重、依从性最差、住院次数最多且预后最差的精神分裂症患者,即在疾病后期。然而,越来越多的作者认为,疾病早期患者可能从LAI AP中获益最多,此时他们的疾病最易治疗,避免复发和再次住院可能带来最大益处。为了证明LAI AP相对于口服抗精神病药物的优势,出现了一种新型临床试验设计的演变,它结合了自然主义“现实生活”研究和RCT的一些最佳特征,即务实的RCT。目前,以色列和欧洲国家正在进行一项试验(EULAST研究),这是这种“新”临床试验设计的一个例子。EULAST是一项务实的随机开放标签队列研究,包括对病程早期的精神分裂症患者进行自然主义类型的随访。希望它能消除对LAI AP相对于口服抗精神病药物优势的疑虑,并帮助临床医生优化患者的治疗效果。