Liu K Q, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Lin D, Zhou C L, Liu B C, Gong X Y, Zhao X L, Wei S N, Zhang G J, Gong B F, Li Y, Liu Y T, Mi Y C, Wang J X, Wei H
Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Tianjin 300020, China.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 14;40(6):497-501. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.06.009.
To compare the time of the recovery of neutrophils or leukocytes by pegylated recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) or common recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in the myelosuppressive phase after induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. At the same time, the incidences of infection and hospitalization were compared. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with newly diagnosed AML who met the enrollment criteria from August 2014 to December 2017. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a 1:1 ratio: PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group. The time of neutrophil or leukocyte recovery, infection rate and hospitalization interval were compared between the two groups. 60 patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled: 30 patients in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and 30 patients in the rhG-CSF group. There were no significant differences in age, chemotherapy regimen, pre-chemotherapy ANC, WBC, and induction efficacy between the two groups (>0.05) . The median time (range) of ANC or WBC recovery in patients with PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF were 19 (14-35) d and 19 (15-26) d, respectively, with no statistical difference (=0.566) . The incidences of infection in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and the rhG-CSF group were 90.0%and 93.3%, respectively, and there was no statistical difference (=1.000) . The median days of hospitalization (range) was 20.5 (17-49) days and 21 (19-43) days, respectively, with no statistical difference (=0.530) . In AML patients after induction therapy, there was no significant difference between the application of PEG-rhG-CSF and daily rhG-CSF in ANC or WBC recovery time, infection incidence and hospitalization time.
比较聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)与普通重组人粒细胞刺激因子(rhG-CSF)对新诊断急性髓系白血病(AML)患者诱导化疗后骨髓抑制期中性粒细胞或白细胞恢复时间的影响。同时,比较两组感染发生率及住院情况。对2014年8月至2017年12月符合纳入标准的新诊断AML患者进行前瞻性随机对照试验。患者按1:1比例随机分为两组:PEG-rhG-CSF组和rhG-CSF组。比较两组中性粒细胞或白细胞恢复时间、感染率及住院时间。共纳入60例新诊断AML患者,PEG-rhG-CSF组和rhG-CSF组各30例。两组患者年龄、化疗方案、化疗前中性粒细胞绝对值(ANC)、白细胞计数(WBC)及诱导疗效比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。PEG-rhG-CSF组和rhG-CSF组患者ANC或WBC恢复的中位时间(范围)分别为19(1435)天和19(1526)天,差异无统计学意义(=0.566)。PEG-rhG-CSF组和rhG-CSF组感染发生率分别为90.0%和93.3%,差异无统计学意义(=1.000)。住院时间的中位天数(范围)分别为20.5(1749)天和21(1943)天,差异无统计学意义(=0.530)。在AML诱导治疗后的患者中,应用PEG-rhG-CSF与每日应用rhG-CSF在ANC或WBC恢复时间、感染发生率及住院时间方面差异均无统计学意义。