Suppr超能文献

中文版癌症患者抑郁污名量表(DSS)的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。

Psychometric properties of the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) in Chinese cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China

Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e028429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028429.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) is commonly used to assess depression stigma in the general population and in people with depression. The DSS includes two 9-item subscales assumed to measure personal depression stigma (ie, personal perceptions of depression) and perceived depression stigma (ie, perceptions of how others perceive depression). The aim of the present study was to examine its psychometric properties in terms of validity and reliability in Chinese cancer patients.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS

This study focused on 301 Chinese cancer patients recruited from two hospitals in Xi'an, China.

METHODS

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. To examine concurrent validity, symptoms of depression were used as the criterion.

RESULTS

For each subscale of the DSS (ie, personal and perceived depression stigma), the EFA and CFA confirmed a two-factor structure: weak-not-sick (ie, perceiving that depression is not a real illness, but rather a sign of weakness) and discrimination (ie, perceiving that depressed people are discriminated against). The Cronbach's alphas were adequate, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80. Symptoms of depression were positively but weakly correlated to personal and perceived depression stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

The DSS appeared to show satisfactory psychometric properties in our sample of cancer patients. Both personal depression stigma and perceived depression stigma subscales consisted of two underlying aspects.

摘要

目的

抑郁污名量表(DSS)常用于评估普通人群和抑郁症患者的抑郁污名。DSS 包括两个 9 项分量表,分别用于衡量个人的抑郁污名(即对抑郁的个人看法)和感知到的抑郁污名(即对他人对抑郁的看法的看法)。本研究旨在考察其在中国癌症患者中的有效性和可靠性的心理测量学特性。

设计

横断面研究设计。

参与者和设置

本研究专注于从中国西安的两家医院招募的 301 名中国癌症患者。

方法

采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来评估因子结构。采用 Cronbach's alpha 评估内部一致性。为了检验同时效度,以抑郁症状作为标准。

结果

对于 DSS 的每个分量表(即个人和感知到的抑郁污名),EFA 和 CFA 均证实了两因素结构:虚弱而非病态(即认为抑郁不是一种真正的疾病,而是虚弱的标志)和歧视(即认为抑郁的人受到歧视)。Cronbach's alpha 值适中,范围在 0.70 至 0.80 之间。抑郁症状与个人和感知到的抑郁污名呈正相关,但相关性较弱。

结论

DSS 在我们的癌症患者样本中显示出令人满意的心理测量学特性。个人抑郁污名和感知到的抑郁污名分量表都由两个潜在方面组成。

相似文献

5
[French translation, validation and adaptation of the Stigma Scale].[耻辱量表的法语翻译、验证与改编]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
9
[Psychometric properties of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy].[癫痫耻辱感量表的心理测量学特性]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2019;119(11. Vyp. 2):29-33. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911911229.

引用本文的文献

3
Stigmatizing attitudes towards depression among university students in Syria.叙利亚大学生对抑郁症的污名化态度。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0273483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273483. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Cancer statistics in China, 2015.《中国癌症统计数据 2015》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验