Department of Immunology, Hôpital l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France;
Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):1173-1182. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11791018. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Different rituximab protocols are used to treat membranous nephropathy. We compared two rituximab protocols in patients with membranous nephropathy.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-eight participants from the NICE cohort received two infusions of 1-g rituximab at 2-week intervals, whereas 27 participants from the Prospective Randomized Multicentric Open Label Study to Evaluate Rituximab Treatment for Membranous Nephropathy (GEMRITUX) cohort received two infusions of 375 mg/m at 1-week interval. We measured serum rituximab levels and compared remission at month 6 and before any treatment modification and analyzed factors associated with remission and relapses.
Remissions occurred in 18 (64%) versus eight (30%) from the NICE and GEMRITUX cohort (=0.02) at month 6, respectively, and in 24 (86%) versus 18 (67%) participants (=0.12) before treatment modification, respectively. Median time to remission was 3 [interquartile range (IQR), 3-9] and 9 [IQR, 6-12] months for NICE and GEMRITUX cohorts respectively (=0.01). Participants from the NICE cohort had higher circulating level of rituximab and lower CD19 counts (3.3 µg/L [IQR, 0.0-10.8] versus 0.0 [IQR, 0.0-0.0] <0.001 and 0.0 [IQR, 0.0-2.0] versus 16.5 [IQR, 2.5-31.0] <0.001) at month 3, lower level of anti-PLA2R1 antibodies at month 6 (0.0 [IQR, 0.0-8.0] versus 8.3 [IQR, 0.0-73.5] =0.03). In the combined study population, lower epitope spreading at diagnosis and higher rituximab levels at month 3 were associated with remissions at month 6 (13/26 (50%) versus 22/29 (76%) =0.05 and 2.2 µg/ml [IQR, 0.0-10.9] versus 0.0 µg/ml [IQR, 0.0-0.0] <0.001 respectively). All non-spreaders entered into remission whatever the protocol. Eight of the 41 participants who reached remission had relapses. Epitope spreading at diagnosis (8/8 (100%) versus 16/33 (48%) =0.01) and incomplete depletion of anti-PLA2R1 antibodies at month 6 (4/8 (50%) versus 5/33 (9%) =0.05) were associated with relapses.
Our work suggests that higher dose rituximab protocol is more effective on depletion of B-cells and lack of epitope spreading is associated with remission of membranous nephropathy.
不同的利妥昔单抗方案用于治疗膜性肾病。我们比较了两种利妥昔单抗方案在膜性肾病患者中的应用。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:28 名来自 NICE 队列的参与者接受了两次 1g 利妥昔单抗治疗,间隔 2 周,而 27 名来自前瞻性随机多中心开放标签研究评估利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病(GEMRITUX)队列的参与者接受了两次 375mg/m 的治疗,间隔 1 周。我们测量了血清利妥昔单抗水平,并比较了第 6 个月和任何治疗前的缓解情况,并分析了与缓解和复发相关的因素。
第 6 个月时,NICE 和 GEMRITUX 队列的缓解率分别为 18 例(64%)和 8 例(30%)(=0.02),治疗前分别为 24 例(86%)和 18 例(67%)(=0.12)。NICE 和 GEMRITUX 队列的中位缓解时间分别为 3 [四分位间距(IQR),3-9]和 9 [IQR,6-12]个月(=0.01)。NICE 队列的参与者具有更高的循环利妥昔单抗水平和更低的 CD19 计数(3.3µg/L [IQR,0.0-10.8]与 0.0 [IQR,0.0-0.0] <0.001 和 0.0 [IQR,0.0-2.0]与 16.5 [IQR,2.5-31.0] <0.001)在第 3 个月,第 6 个月时的抗 PLA2R1 抗体水平更低(0.0 [IQR,0.0-8.0]与 8.3 [IQR,0.0-73.5] =0.03)。在联合研究人群中,诊断时的表位扩展较低和第 3 个月时的利妥昔单抗水平较高与第 6 个月的缓解相关(13/26(50%)与 22/29(76%)=0.05 和 2.2µg/ml [IQR,0.0-10.9]与 0.0µg/ml [IQR,0.0-0.0] <0.001)。所有非扩展者均进入缓解状态,无论采用何种方案。41 名达到缓解的参与者中有 8 名复发。诊断时的表位扩展(8/8(100%)与 16/33(48%)=0.01)和第 6 个月时不完全清除抗 PLA2R1 抗体(4/8(50%)与 5/33(9%)=0.05)与复发相关。
我们的工作表明,更高剂量的利妥昔单抗方案在耗尽 B 细胞方面更有效,缺乏表位扩展与膜性肾病的缓解相关。