• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于急诊科临床试验资格筛选的实时自动患者筛查系统:设计与评估

A Real-Time Automated Patient Screening System for Clinical Trials Eligibility in an Emergency Department: Design and Evaluation.

作者信息

Ni Yizhao, Bermudez Monica, Kennebeck Stephanie, Liddy-Hicks Stacey, Dexheimer Judith

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jul 24;7(3):e14185. doi: 10.2196/14185.

DOI:10.2196/14185
PMID:31342909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6685132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One critical hurdle for clinical trial recruitment is the lack of an efficient method for identifying subjects who meet the eligibility criteria. Given the large volume of data documented in electronic health records (EHRs), it is labor-intensive for the staff to screen relevant information, particularly within the time frame needed. To facilitate subject identification, we developed a natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning-based system, Automated Clinical Trial Eligibility Screener (ACTES), which analyzes structured data and unstructured narratives automatically to determine patients' suitability for clinical trial enrollment. In this study, we integrated the ACTES into clinical practice to support real-time patient screening.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate ACTES's impact on the institutional workflow, prospectively and comprehensively. We hypothesized that compared with the manual screening process, using EHR-based automated screening would improve efficiency of patient identification, streamline patient recruitment workflow, and increase enrollment in clinical trials.

METHODS

The ACTES was fully integrated into the clinical research coordinators' (CRC) workflow in the pediatric emergency department (ED) at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. The system continuously analyzed EHR information for current ED patients and recommended potential candidates for clinical trials. Relevant patient eligibility information was presented in real time on a dashboard available to CRCs to facilitate their recruitment. To assess the system's effectiveness, we performed a multidimensional, prospective evaluation for a 12-month period, including a time-and-motion study, quantitative assessments of enrollment, and postevaluation usability surveys collected from the CRCs.

RESULTS

Compared with manual screening, the use of ACTES reduced the patient screening time by 34% (P<.001). The saved time was redirected to other activities such as study-related administrative tasks (P=.03) and work-related conversations (P=.006) that streamlined teamwork among the CRCs. The quantitative assessments showed that automated screening improved the numbers of subjects screened, approached, and enrolled by 14.7%, 11.1%, and 11.1%, respectively, suggesting the potential of ACTES in streamlining recruitment workflow. Finally, the ACTES achieved a system usability scale of 80.0 in the postevaluation surveys, suggesting that it was a good computerized solution.

CONCLUSIONS

By leveraging NLP and machine learning technologies, the ACTES demonstrated good capacity for improving efficiency of patient identification. The quantitative assessments demonstrated the potential of ACTES in streamlining recruitment workflow and improving patient enrollment. The postevaluation surveys suggested that the system was a good computerized solution with satisfactory usability.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/6685132/c24051de5491/medinform_v7i3e14185_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/6685132/a13e6a81631b/medinform_v7i3e14185_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/6685132/c24051de5491/medinform_v7i3e14185_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/6685132/a13e6a81631b/medinform_v7i3e14185_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2619/6685132/c24051de5491/medinform_v7i3e14185_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

临床试验招募面临的一个关键障碍是缺乏一种有效的方法来识别符合入选标准的受试者。鉴于电子健康记录(EHR)中记录的数据量巨大,工作人员筛选相关信息的工作量很大,尤其是在所需的时间范围内。为便于识别受试者,我们开发了一种基于自然语言处理(NLP)和机器学习的系统——自动临床试验资格筛选器(ACTES),该系统可自动分析结构化数据和非结构化叙述,以确定患者是否适合参加临床试验。在本研究中,我们将ACTES整合到临床实践中,以支持实时患者筛选。

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性、全面地评估ACTES对机构工作流程的影响。我们假设,与人工筛选过程相比,使用基于EHR的自动筛选将提高患者识别效率,简化患者招募工作流程,并增加临床试验的入组人数。

方法

ACTES完全整合到辛辛那提儿童医院医疗中心儿科急诊科(ED)临床研究协调员(CRC)的工作流程中。该系统持续分析当前ED患者的EHR信息,并推荐临床试验的潜在候选人。相关患者资格信息实时显示在CRC可访问的仪表板上,以方便他们进行招募。为评估该系统的有效性,我们进行了为期12个月的多维度前瞻性评估,包括时间与动作研究、入组的定量评估,以及从CRC收集的评估后可用性调查。

结果

与人工筛选相比,使用ACTES将患者筛选时间减少了34%(P<.001)。节省的时间被重新分配到其他活动中,如与研究相关的行政任务(P=.03)和与工作相关的对话(P=.006),这些活动简化了CRC之间的团队协作。定量评估表明,自动筛选分别将筛选、接触和入组的受试者数量提高了14.7%、11.1%和11.1%,表明ACTES在简化招募工作流程方面具有潜力。最后,ACTES在评估后调查中的系统可用性量表得分为80.0,表明它是一个良好的计算机化解决方案。

结论

通过利用NLP和机器学习技术,ACTES在提高患者识别效率方面表现出良好的能力。定量评估证明了ACTES在简化招募工作流程和提高患者入组率方面的潜力。评估后调查表明,该系统是一个具有令人满意的可用性的良好计算机化解决方案。

相似文献

1
A Real-Time Automated Patient Screening System for Clinical Trials Eligibility in an Emergency Department: Design and Evaluation.一种用于急诊科临床试验资格筛选的实时自动患者筛查系统:设计与评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jul 24;7(3):e14185. doi: 10.2196/14185.
2
Automated clinical trial eligibility prescreening: increasing the efficiency of patient identification for clinical trials in the emergency department.自动化临床试验资格预筛查:提高急诊科临床试验患者识别效率
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):166-78. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002887. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.提高试验患者匹配效率:针对儿科肿瘤患者的自动化临床试验资格预筛选
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 14;15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0149-3.
5
Piloting an automated clinical trial eligibility surveillance and provider alert system based on artificial intelligence and standard data models.基于人工智能和标准数据模型,试点自动化临床试验资格监测和提供方提醒系统。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01916-6.
6
Implementation of Machine Learning Pipelines for Clinical Practice: Development and Validation Study.用于临床实践的机器学习管道的实施:开发与验证研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Dec 16;10(12):e37833. doi: 10.2196/37833.
7
Optimizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Design Using Natural Language Processing Models and Real-World Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.使用自然语言处理模型和真实世界数据优化临床试验资格设计:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2024 Jul 29;3:e50800. doi: 10.2196/50800.
8
Automated detection of substance use information from electronic health records for a pediatric population.从电子健康记录中自动检测儿科人群的物质使用信息。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2116-2127. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab116.
9
A Time-and-Motion Study of Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科临床试验资格筛查的时间与动作研究
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Dec;35(12):868-873. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001592.
10
The Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Using Natural Language Processing to Screen Hospitalized Adults for Unhealthy Substance Use: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Design.使用自然语言处理技术对住院成人进行不健康物质使用筛查的临床决策支持工具评估:准实验设计方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):e42971. doi: 10.2196/42971.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and implementation of cancer clinical trial patient screening using an electronic medical record-integrated trial matching system.使用电子病历集成试验匹配系统进行癌症临床试验患者筛选的开发与实施。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 16;32(1):e101295. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101295.
2
Pediatric Predictive Artificial Intelligence Implemented in Clinical Practice from 2010 to 2021: A Systematic Review.2010年至2021年在临床实践中应用的儿科预测人工智能:一项系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):477-487. doi: 10.1055/a-2521-1508. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A Time-and-Motion Study of Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科临床试验资格筛查的时间与动作研究
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Dec;35(12):868-873. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001592.
2
Will they participate? Predicting patients' response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department.他们会参与吗?预测儿科急诊科患者对临床试验邀请的反应。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):671-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv216. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Automated eligibility screening and monitoring for genotype-driven precision oncology trials.
医疗保健中仪表板的开发、实施和评估方法:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 10;12:e59828. doi: 10.2196/59828.
4
"The Truth Is, We Must Miss Some": A Qualitative Study of the Patient Eligibility Screening Process, and Automation Perspectives, for Cancer Clinical Trials.“事实是,我们必定会有所遗漏”:一项关于癌症临床试验患者资格筛选过程及自动化前景的定性研究
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(23):e70466. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70466.
5
User Requirements for an Electronic Patient Recruitment System: Semistructured Interview Analysis After First Implementation in 3 German University Hospitals.电子患者招募系统的用户需求:在 3 家德国大学医院首次实施后的半结构化访谈分析。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 27;11:e56872. doi: 10.2196/56872.
6
Utilization of EHRs for clinical trials: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录进行临床试验:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02177-7.
7
Evaluation of Eligibility Criteria Relevance for the Purpose of IT-Supported Trial Recruitment: Descriptive Quantitative Analysis.基于信息技术支持的试验招募目的评估资格标准的相关性:描述性定量分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 31;8:e49347. doi: 10.2196/49347.
8
The role of artificial intelligence in hastening time to recruitment in clinical trials.人工智能在加快临床试验招募速度方面的作用。
BJR Open. 2023 May 16;5(1):20220023. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20220023. eCollection 2023.
9
Cohort Identification from Free-Text Clinical Notes Using SNOMED CT's Hierarchical Semantic Relations.基于 SNOMED CT 层级语义关系的自由文本临床记录中的队列识别。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:349-358. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders.探索临床试验背景下的实施结果:一项针对医生试验利益相关者的定性研究。
Trials. 2023 Apr 27;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07304-1.
针对基因型驱动的精准肿瘤学试验的自动资格筛选和监测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):777-81. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw020. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
4
A Systematic Review of Nurses' Experiences With Unintended Consequences When Using the Electronic Health Record.对护士使用电子健康记录时意外后果经历的系统评价
Nurs Adm Q. 2015 Oct-Dec;39(4):345-56. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000119.
5
Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.提高试验患者匹配效率:针对儿科肿瘤患者的自动化临床试验资格预筛选
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 14;15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0149-3.
6
Factors associated with participation in research conducted in a pediatric emergency department.与参与儿科急诊科开展的研究相关的因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 May;31(5):348-52. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000368.
7
Automated clinical trial eligibility prescreening: increasing the efficiency of patient identification for clinical trials in the emergency department.自动化临床试验资格预筛查:提高急诊科临床试验患者识别效率
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):166-78. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002887. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
8
Barriers to accrue to clinical trials and possible solutions.临床试验累积的障碍及可能的解决方案。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 12;111(4):637-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.318. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
Lack of timely accrual information in oncology clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis.肿瘤临床试验中缺乏及时的累积信息:一项横断面分析。
Trials. 2014 Mar 25;15:92. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-92.
10
Evaluating the impact of electronic health records on nurse clinical process at two community health sites.评估电子健康记录对两个社区卫生站点护士临床流程的影响。
NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:381. eCollection 2012.