Vettermann J, Brusasco V, Rehder K
Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 May;64(5):1864-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.5.1864.
In 12 anesthetized paralyzed dogs, pulmonary gas exchange and intrapulmonary inspired gas distribution were compared between continuous-flow ventilation (CFV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Nine dogs were studied while they were lying supine, and three dogs were studied while they were lying prone. A single-lumen catheter for tracheal insufflation and a double-lumen catheter for bilateral endobronchial insufflation [inspired O2 fraction = 0.4; inspired minute ventilation = 1.7 +/- 0.3 (SD) 1.kg-1.min-1] were evaluated. Intrapulmonary gas distribution was assessed from regional 133Xe clearances. In dogs lying supine, CO2 elimination was more efficient with endobronchial insufflation than with tracheal insufflation, but the alveolar-arterial O2 partial pressure difference was larger during CFV than during CMV, regardless of the type of insufflation. By contrast, endobronchial insufflation maintained both arterial PCO2 and alveolar-arterial O2 partial pressure difference at significantly lower levels in dogs lying prone than in dogs lying supine. In dogs lying supine, the dependent lung was preferentially ventilated during CMV but not during CFV. In dogs lying prone, gas distribution was uniform with both modes of ventilation. The alveolar-arterial O2 partial pressure difference during CFV in dogs lying supine was negatively correlated with the reduced ventilation of the dependent lung, which suggests that increased ventilation-perfusion mismatching was responsible for the increase in alveolar-arterial O2 partial pressure difference. The more efficient oxygenation during CFV in dogs lying prone suggests a more efficient matching of ventilation to perfusion, presumably because the distribution of blood flow is also nearly uniform.
在12只麻醉致瘫的犬中,比较了持续气流通气(CFV)和传统机械通气(CMV)时的肺气体交换和肺内吸入气体分布。9只犬在仰卧位时进行研究,3只犬在俯卧位时进行研究。评估了用于气管吹气的单腔导管和用于双侧支气管内吹气的双腔导管[吸入氧分数 = 0.4;吸入分钟通气量 = 1.7±0.3(标准差)1.kg-1.min-1]。通过区域133Xe清除率评估肺内气体分布。在仰卧位的犬中,支气管内吹气比气管吹气的二氧化碳清除更有效,但无论吹气类型如何,CFV期间的肺泡-动脉氧分压差值均大于CMV期间。相比之下,支气管内吹气使俯卧位犬的动脉PCO2和肺泡-动脉氧分压差值均显著低于仰卧位犬。在仰卧位的犬中,CMV期间下肺优先通气,而CFV期间则不然。在俯卧位的犬中,两种通气模式下气体分布均均匀。仰卧位犬CFV期间的肺泡-动脉氧分压差值与下肺通气减少呈负相关,这表明通气-灌注不匹配增加是肺泡-动脉氧分压差值增加的原因。俯卧位犬CFV期间更有效的氧合表明通气与灌注的匹配更有效,推测是因为血流分布也几乎均匀。