• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村居住对退伍军人事务部移植项目中等待名单上候选人的肾移植率的影响。

Impact of Rural Residence on Kidney Transplant Rates Among Waitlisted Candidates in the VA Transplant Programs.

机构信息

Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VAMC, Iowa City, IA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2019 Sep;103(9):1945-1952. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002624.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002624
PMID:31343570
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although proportionally more veterans live in rural areas compared to nonveterans, the impact of rurality status on kidney transplantation (KTP) access among veterans is unknown. Our objective was to study KTP rates among veterans listed for KTP and to compare the impact of rurality status on KTP rates among veterans and nonveterans.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult patients waitlisted per the United Network for Organ Sharing from January 2000 to December 2014. Patient characteristics were compared using Chi-square or t tests, as appropriate, by veteran status and patient rurality. Multivariable competing-risks Cox regression was performed.

RESULTS

The study sample included 3281 veterans receiving care in Veteran Health Administration transplant programs and 445 177 nonveterans. Veterans, compared to nonveterans, were older (57 versus 50 y; P < 0.001), more likely to be male (96% versus 60%; P < 0.001) or diabetic at waitlisting (51% versus 41%; P < 0.001), and less likely be an urban resident (79% versus 84%; P < 0.001). Among veterans, dialysis duration prior to registration was longer among urban compared to all other rurality types (810 ± 22.1 d versus 632 to 702 ± 41.6 to 77.6 d; P = 0.02). In multivariate competing risks models, there was no evidence that the hazard of transplant among veterans differs by residential rurality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among waitlisted veterans served by Veteran Health Administration transplant programs, residential rurality status does not portend longer waiting time for KTP.

摘要

背景

尽管与非退役军人相比,退役军人中农村人口的比例更高,但农村人口身份对退役军人接受肾移植(KTP)的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究接受 KTP 治疗的退役军人的 KTP 率,并比较农村人口身份对退役军人和非退役军人 KTP 率的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2000 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间根据美国器官共享网络等待 KTP 的成年患者。使用卡方检验或 t 检验比较退役军人和非退役军人的患者特征,具体取决于农村人口身份。采用多变量竞争风险 Cox 回归。

结果

研究样本包括 3281 名在退伍军人健康管理局移植项目中接受治疗的退役军人和 445177 名非退役军人。与非退役军人相比,退役军人年龄更大(57 岁比 50 岁;P<0.001),男性(96%比 60%;P<0.001)或糖尿病(51%比 41%;P<0.001)等待 KTP 时的比例更高,城市居民(79%比 84%;P<0.001)的比例更低。在退役军人中,与其他所有农村类型相比,城市居民登记前的透析时间更长(810±22.1 d 比 632 至 702±41.6 至 77.6 d;P=0.02)。在多变量竞争风险模型中,没有证据表明退役军人的移植风险因居住农村人口身份而异。

结论

在退伍军人健康管理局移植项目服务的等待 KTP 的退役军人中,居住农村人口身份并不预示着 KTP 的等待时间更长。

相似文献

1
Impact of Rural Residence on Kidney Transplant Rates Among Waitlisted Candidates in the VA Transplant Programs.农村居住对退伍军人事务部移植项目中等待名单上候选人的肾移植率的影响。
Transplantation. 2019 Sep;103(9):1945-1952. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002624.
2
Association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans.美国退伍军人中,与移植中心的距离与获得候补名单安置、接受肝移植和生存的关系。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 26;311(12):1234-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2520.
3
Significantly Lower Rates of Kidney Transplantation among Candidates Listed with the Veterans Administration: A National and Local Comparison.在退伍军人管理局(VA)登记的候选者中,肾移植的比例显著降低:全国和地方比较。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Oct;29(10):2574-2582. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017111204. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
4
Social deprivation, ethnicity, and access to the deceased donor kidney transplant waiting list in England and Wales.社会剥夺、种族与在英格兰和威尔士获得已故供者肾移植等待名单的机会。
Transplantation. 2010 Aug 15;90(3):279-85. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e346e3.
5
Access to kidney transplantation among patients insured by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部参保患者的肾移植情况。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;18(9):2592-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007010050. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
6
Temporal Analysis of Market Competition and Density in Renal Transplantation Volume and Outcome.肾移植数量与结果的市场竞争及密度的时间分析
Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):670-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000851.
7
Survival and quality of life after organ transplantation in veterans and nonveterans.退伍军人和非退伍军人器官移植后的生存率和生活质量。
Am J Surg. 2003 Nov;186(5):476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.024.
8
The interaction between rural/urban status and dual use status among veterans with heart failure.心力衰竭退伍军人的农村/城市身份与两用身份之间的相互作用。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4495. doi: 10.22605/RRH4495. Epub 2018 May 10.
9
Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.农村和城市地区居民的实体器官等待名单登记率、移植率和生存率。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):202-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50.
10
Accountability for end-stage organ care: implications of geographic variation in access to kidney transplantation.终末期器官护理的责任:肾脏移植可及性的地理差异影响
Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):734-42. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Rurality predisposes departure from gold-standard care, leading to delayed or accelerated access to surgery: insights from a scoping review.农村地区更容易偏离金标准治疗,导致手术时机延迟或提前:一项范围综述的见解
Can J Surg. 2025 Jan 3;68(1):E17-E31. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000124. Print 2025 Jan-Feb.
2
Rurality of patient residence and access to transplantation among children with kidney failure in the United States.美国肾衰竭儿童的居住地农村性与移植机会。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Apr;39(4):1239-1244. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-06148-w. Epub 2023 Sep 28.