Yalmanchili Harish M, Buchanan Stephanie N, Chambers Lowell W, Thorns Jantzen D, McKenzie Nicholas A, Reiss Alisha D, Page Maurice P, Dizon Victor V, Brooks Sheila E, Shaffer Lynn E, Lovald Scott T, Hartranft Thomas H, Price Phillip D
Resident, Department of Surgery, Mount Carmel Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
Attending, Program Director (Surgery), Department of Surgery, Mount Carmel Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
J Opioid Manag. 2019 Mar/Apr;15(2):169-175. doi: 10.5055/jom.2019.0498.
Efforts to achieve balance between effective pain management and opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs) have led to multimodal analgesia regimens. This study compared opioids delivered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) plus liposomal bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic with potential to be an effective component of such regimens, to opioids delivered through PCA alone or PCA plus subcutaneous bupivacaine infusion (ONQ), following laparotomy.
Prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Single, tertiary-care institution.
One hundred patients undergoing nonemergent laparotomy.
Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study treatments: PCA only (PCAO), PCA with ONQ, or PCA with injectable liposomal bupivacaine suspension (EXP).
Cumulative opioid use, daily mean patient-reported pain scores, and ORAEs through 72 hours postoperatively.
On average, the EXP (n = 31) group exhibited less than 50 percent of the total opioid consumption of the PCAO (n = 36) group, and less than 60 percent of that for the ONQ (n = 33) group. Postoperative days 1 and 3 pain scores were significantly lower for the EXP group as compared to the ONQ and PCAO groups (p ≤ 0.005). Fewer patients in the EXP group (19.4 percent) experienced ORAEs compared to the PCAO (41.1 percent) and ONQ (45.5 percent) groups (p = 0.002).
Laparotomy patients treated with liposomal bupivacaine as part of a multimodal regimen consumed less opioids, had lower pain scores, and had fewer ORAEs. The role of liposomal bupivacaine in the postoperative care of laparotomy patients merits further study.
为了在有效疼痛管理与阿片类药物相关不良事件(ORAEs)之间取得平衡,人们采用了多模式镇痛方案。本研究比较了在剖腹手术后,通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)加脂质体布比卡因(一种长效局部麻醉剂,可能是此类方案的有效组成部分)给予阿片类药物,与单独通过PCA或PCA加皮下布比卡因输注(ONQ)给予阿片类药物的效果。
前瞻性随机对照试验。
单一的三级医疗机构。
100例行非急诊剖腹手术的患者。
患者被随机分配到三种研究治疗方法之一:仅PCA(PCAO)、PCA加ONQ或PCA加注射用脂质体布比卡因混悬液(EXP)。
术后72小时内的累积阿片类药物使用量、患者每日平均报告的疼痛评分以及ORAEs。
平均而言,EXP组(n = 31)的阿片类药物总消耗量不到PCAO组(n = 36)的50%,不到ONQ组(n = 33)的60%。与ONQ组和PCAO组相比,EXP组术后第1天和第3天的疼痛评分显著更低(p≤0.005)。与PCAO组(41.1%)和ONQ组(45.5%)相比,EXP组发生ORAEs的患者更少(19.4%)(p = 0.002)。
作为多模式方案的一部分接受脂质体布比卡因治疗的剖腹手术患者,阿片类药物消耗量更少,疼痛评分更低,ORAEs也更少。脂质体布比卡因在剖腹手术患者术后护理中的作用值得进一步研究。