Research Fellow, Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, Norway.
Disasters. 2020 Oct;44(4):666-686. doi: 10.1111/disa.12395. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
Ideal notions of efficient aid are challenged continuously by realities on the ground in the wake of major disasters, such as dire needs, limited resources, and opportunism. This paper demonstrates how 'relief lists' can be productive entry points for a systematic inquiry into the pervasive politics of disaster assistance. Through an analysis of qualitative data collected during the five years after Cyclone Sidr struck Bangladesh on 15 November 2007, it examines how relief lists featured in both physical and phantom forms and then developed beyond their transparency-making aims, becoming elevated sites of struggle for post-disaster resources. Three list processes, selected to indicate the temporal, material, and spatial dynamics of relief encounters, are assessed in depth. Although recipients of cyclone relief appreciated its value, the paper argues that list politics also stimulated structures of vulnerability, including inequality. Gradually, relief, as governed after Sidr, also served to restore the differential vulnerability of the country's coastal poor.
在重大灾害发生后,如在地面上的实际情况所不断挑战的那样,理想的援助效率观念是有限的资源和机会主义。本文展示了“救济清单”如何成为系统探究灾害援助中普遍存在的政治问题的有益切入点。通过对 2007 年 11 月 15 日旋风锡德袭击孟加拉国后的五年间收集的定性数据进行分析,本文考察了救济清单如何以有形和虚拟的形式出现,然后超越其透明度的目的,成为争夺灾后资源的斗争的重要场所。本文选择了三个清单流程来深入评估,以显示救济遭遇的时间、物质和空间动态。尽管旋风救济的接受者赞赏其价值,但本文认为,清单政治也刺激了脆弱性结构,包括不平等。随着锡德的到来,救济逐渐成为恢复该国沿海贫困人口差异脆弱性的手段。