Suppr超能文献

预防性与骨折后稳定治疗长骨转移病灶:30 天术后结局比较。

Prophylactic Versus Postfracture Stabilization for Metastatic Lesions of the Long Bones: A Comparison of 30-day Postoperative Outcomes.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. El Abiad, Dr. Raad, Dr. Puvanesarajah, Dr. Rao, Dr. Morris, and Dr. Levin), the Department of Pathology (Dr. Morris and Dr. Levin), and the Department of Oncology (Dr. Morris and Dr. Levin), The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Aug 1;27(15):e709-e716. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00345.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The goals of orthopaedic treatment for most patients with osseous metastases are to control pain, maintain function, and maximize quality of life and time at home. The aim of this study was to determine differences in 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality between patients who underwent prophylactic versus postfracture stabilization for metastatic lesions of long bones.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent prophylactic fixation (n = 461) or postfracture stabilization (n = 856) for pathologic fractures because of metastatic lesions of long bones from 2006 to 2016. The groups were compared with respect to several potential confounders using Student t, Kruskal-Wallis, and χ tests. Logistic and Poisson regression models (inclusion threshold of P < 0.1) were used to assess the associations of functional status with outcomes. The alpha level was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Prophylactic fixation was associated with a lower risk of major medical complications (odds ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.93; P = 0.02), discharge to a care facility rather than home (odds ratio = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.63; P < 0.01), and lower risk of a longer hospital stay (incidence risk ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.96; P = 0.01) compared with postfracture stabilization. No significant difference was found in the risk of unplanned revision surgery or 30-day postoperative mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although prevention of pathologic fractures caused by metastatic disease may not always be possible, patients who underwent prophylactic stabilization had a lower risk of major complications within 30 days postoperatively and shorter hospital stays compared with patients who underwent postfracture stabilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort.

摘要

介绍

对于大多数患有骨转移的患者,骨科治疗的目标是控制疼痛、维持功能、最大程度地提高生活质量并延长在家的时间。本研究的目的是确定对长骨转移病灶进行预防性固定与骨折后稳定治疗的患者在 30 天术后发病率和死亡率方面的差异。

方法

2006 年至 2016 年,美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库对因长骨转移病灶发生病理性骨折而接受预防性固定(n=461)或骨折后稳定治疗(n=856)的患者进行了查询。使用学生 t 检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和 χ2 检验比较了两组之间的几个潜在混杂因素。使用逻辑和泊松回归模型(纳入阈值 P<0.1)评估功能状态与结果的关联。α 水平设定为 0.05。

结果

预防性固定与主要医疗并发症风险降低相关(优势比=0.64;95%置信区间[CI],0.45 至 0.93;P=0.02),与骨折后稳定治疗相比,更有可能出院到护理机构而不是回家(优势比=0.48;95%CI,0.36 至 0.63;P<0.01),且住院时间较短(发病率风险比=0.86;95%CI,0.74 至 0.96;P=0.01)。两组之间在计划外翻修手术风险或 30 天术后死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论

尽管预防由转移性疾病引起的病理性骨折可能并非总是可行,但与骨折后稳定治疗相比,接受预防性固定的患者在术后 30 天内发生重大并发症的风险较低,且住院时间较短。

证据等级

IV 级,回顾性队列研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验