Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Isala Clinics Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220417. eCollection 2019.
Clinicians should not only know how many patients will benefit from alpha-blocker therapy but should also be able to identify who will benefit. We studied the changes in patient symptoms following alpha-blocker therapy and the predictors of symptom improvement in clinical practice.
This was a single-arm, open-label observational cohort study with a 6-week follow-up.
Twenty-two pharmacies in the Netherlands.
Patients were eligible for inclusion if they attended a pharmacy with a new prescription for an alpha-blocker from a general practitioner or urologist.
Outcomes were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Demographic, disease-related, and drug-related information were collected to identify predictors of symptom improvement. These predictors were then assessed by logistic and linear regression analyses of both the original data set and an imputed data set that accounted for the missing variables.
During the study, 37% of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms perceived clear symptomatic improvement based on the results of the PGI-I. Improvement was more likely in those who still used alpha-blockers at the end of the 6-week study period and in those who used multiple medications. Although symptom scores decreased significantly on the IPSS and OAB-q SF, the only predictor of change was the pretreatment symptom severity.
Approximately one-third of our cohort perceived symptom improvement on alpha-blocker therapy. However, we identified no clear predictors of who might benefit from alpha-blocker treatment, indicating that alpha-blockers should still be prescribed on a trial basis.
临床医生不仅要知道有多少患者将从α-受体阻滞剂治疗中获益,还要能够识别出哪些患者将从中获益。我们研究了α-受体阻滞剂治疗后患者症状的变化,以及在临床实践中症状改善的预测因素。
这是一项单臂、开放标签的观察性队列研究,随访时间为 6 周。
荷兰的 22 家药店。
如果患者从全科医生或泌尿科医生处到药店开新的α-受体阻滞剂处方,他们就有资格入组。
使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、膀胱过度活动症问卷简表(OAB-q SF)和患者总体印象改善(PGI-I)评估结局。收集人口统计学、疾病相关和药物相关信息,以确定症状改善的预测因素。然后,通过对原始数据集和一个考虑了缺失变量的推断数据集进行逻辑回归和线性回归分析,评估这些预测因素。
在研究期间,37%的下尿路症状患者根据 PGI-I 的结果认为自己的症状明显改善。在研究结束时仍使用α-受体阻滞剂的患者和使用多种药物的患者改善的可能性更大。尽管 IPSS 和 OAB-q SF 的症状评分显著下降,但唯一的变化预测因素是治疗前的症状严重程度。
我们队列中有大约三分之一的患者认为α-受体阻滞剂治疗有效。然而,我们没有发现谁可能从α-受体阻滞剂治疗中获益的明确预测因素,这表明α-受体阻滞剂仍应基于试用原则进行处方。