Cho Seok, Kwon Soon-Sun, Lee Kwang Woo, Yoo Tag Keun, Shin Dong Gil, Kim Soo Woong, Bae Jae Hyun, Choi Hoon, Kim Young Ho
The Department of Urology, Ilsanpaik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
The Department of Mathematics, College of Natural Sciences, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 May;71(5). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12938.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy comprising a short-acting anticholinergic, imidafenacin and an alpha-blocker compared with monotherapy with an alpha-blocker only in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and storage symptoms.
The 12-week, prospective, double-blind, randomised trial enrolled men with LUTS and storage symptom. The inclusion criteria were a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, an IPSS question 4 score ≥2, ≥8 micturitions in 24 hours, and a prostate volume >20 mL. The primary outcome was a change in the micturition number from baseline. Bladder diary variables, Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) scores, IPSS and safety were assessed.
Of 260 patients screened, 221 completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an alpha-blocker only (n=111, group 1) or combination therapy comprising an alpha-blocker and an anticholinergic (n=110, group 2) for 12 weeks. Group 1 and 2 showed significant improvement in their 24-hour micturition numbers (-1.87 and -2.08, respectively), nocturia episodes (-0.48 and -0.53, respectively), total IPSS (-9.9 and -8.8, respectively), and PPIUS scores (-0.19 and -0.24, respectively). Micturition number per 24 hours, daytime frequency, urgency, the PPIUS score, the IPSS question 4 score and IPSS QoL score improved significantly in the combination therapy group, but changes in total IPSS, nocturia episodes, and safety outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.
Compared with treatment with an alpha-blocker alone, combination therapy comprising an anticholinergic and an alpha-blocker showed superior efficacy and its safety was similar in patients with LUTS and storage symptoms.
评估在患有下尿路症状(LUTS)及储尿期症状的男性患者中,与仅使用α受体阻滞剂单药治疗相比,联用短效抗胆碱能药物咪达那新和α受体阻滞剂的联合治疗的疗效及安全性。
这项为期12周的前瞻性、双盲、随机试验纳入了患有LUTS及储尿期症状的男性患者。纳入标准为国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)总分≥12分、IPSS问题4评分≥2分、24小时排尿次数≥8次以及前列腺体积>20 mL。主要结局指标为排尿次数相对于基线的变化。评估膀胱日记变量、患者尿急强度感知量表(PPIUS)评分、IPSS及安全性。
在260例筛查患者中,221例完成了研究。患者被随机分配接受仅α受体阻滞剂治疗(n = 111,第1组)或接受α受体阻滞剂与抗胆碱能药物的联合治疗(n = 110,第2组),为期12周。第1组和第2组在24小时排尿次数(分别为-1.87和-2.08)、夜尿次数(分别为-0.48和-0.53)、IPSS总分(分别为-9.9和-8.8)以及PPIUS评分(分别为-0.19和-0.24)方面均有显著改善。联合治疗组每24小时排尿次数、日间排尿频率、尿急、PPIUS评分、IPSS问题4评分及IPSS生活质量评分有显著改善,但两组间IPSS总分、夜尿次数及安全性结局的变化无显著差异。
与仅使用α受体阻滞剂治疗相比,抗胆碱能药物与α受体阻滞剂的联合治疗在患有LUTS及储尿期症状的患者中显示出更优的疗效,且安全性相似。