Suppr超能文献

视听刺激和组胺离子电渗法诱发瘙痒:一项随机对照非劣效性研究。

Itch induction by audiovisual stimuli and histamine iontophoresis: a randomized, controlled noninferiority study.

作者信息

Marzell R, Reichwein G, Gieler U, Kupfer J, Schut C

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology, University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

Clinics for Dermatology and Allergology, University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1253-1261. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18368. Epub 2019 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has mainly used skin-manipulating methods to induce itch. In comparison, itch induced by audiovisual stimuli lacks direct skin manipulation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this double blind, noninferiority study was to test the experimental hypothesis that itch induced by audiovisual stimuli is noninferior to itch induced by histamine iontophoresis in case of priming and without priming.

METHODS

In 80 of 160 healthy volunteers itch was induced by histamine iontophoresis, while in the other 80 itch was induced by audiovisual stimulation. Forty people in each group experienced either an initial resting phase or dermal priming. Itch intensity was measured by visual analogue scales, while scratch duration and frequency were video-recorded and evaluated by two independent raters. In addition, itch quality and location were measured by self-report.

RESULTS

Itch induced by audiovisual stimuli was inferior to itch induced by histamine iontophoresis in the absence of dermal priming. However, in the case of priming, maximal itch induced by audiovisual stimuli was not inferior to maximal itch induced by histamine iontophoresis. Additionally, differences in itch quality and location were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that maximal audiovisually-induced itch was comparable with maximal histamine itch only after priming emphasizes that attention plays a dominant role in mentally-induced itch. The comparability of maximal histamine and audiovisually-induced itch in the case of priming opens up new research opportunities. What's already known about this topic? Itch is a multidimensional sensation that is altered by, among other things, attention. To induce itch in basic research, different methods are used, which are partially invasive or cause skin manipulation. Noninvasive audiovisual stimuli can be used to induce itch. What does this study add? This study investigated whether itch induced by audiovisual stimuli is noninferior to itch induced by histamine iontophoresis. Itch induced by audiovisual stimuli is noninferior with regard to maximal intensity in the case of priming. Noninferiority was not shown in the case of no priming, emphasizing the role of attention in itch induction. Histamine and audiovisually-induced itch differ in terms of quality and location, but not in affective reaction.

摘要

背景

以往研究主要采用皮肤操作方法诱导瘙痒。相比之下,视听刺激诱导的瘙痒缺乏直接的皮肤操作。

目的

本双盲、非劣效性研究的目的是检验实验假设,即在有启动和无启动的情况下,视听刺激诱导的瘙痒不劣于组胺离子导入诱导的瘙痒。

方法

160名健康志愿者中,80人通过组胺离子导入诱导瘙痒,另外80人通过视听刺激诱导瘙痒。每组40人经历初始静息期或皮肤启动。瘙痒强度通过视觉模拟量表测量,抓挠持续时间和频率通过视频记录,并由两名独立评估者进行评估。此外,通过自我报告测量瘙痒性质和部位。

结果

在没有皮肤启动的情况下,视听刺激诱导的瘙痒劣于组胺离子导入诱导的瘙痒。然而,在有启动的情况下,视听刺激诱导的最大瘙痒不劣于组胺离子导入诱导的最大瘙痒。此外,观察到瘙痒性质和部位的差异。

结论

仅在启动后最大视听诱导瘙痒与最大组胺瘙痒具有可比性这一发现强调,注意力在精神性诱导瘙痒中起主导作用。在有启动的情况下最大组胺和视听诱导瘙痒的可比性开辟了新的研究机会。关于这个主题已知的情况是什么?瘙痒是一种多维感觉,会受到多种因素影响,包括注意力。在基础研究中,使用不同方法诱导瘙痒,这些方法部分具有侵入性或会引起皮肤操作。非侵入性视听刺激可用于诱导瘙痒。本研究增加了什么?本研究调查了视听刺激诱导的瘙痒是否不劣于组胺离子导入诱导的瘙痒。在有启动的情况下,视听刺激诱导的瘙痒在最大强度方面不劣于组胺离子导入诱导的瘙痒。在无启动的情况下未显示非劣效性,强调了注意力在瘙痒诱导中的作用。组胺和视听诱导的瘙痒在性质和部位上有所不同,但在情感反应方面没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验