Elsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Sep;155:107797. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107797. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remains one of the most frequently encountered diabetes related emergencies, and despite updates in management and increasing standardisation of care, still has an appreciable morbidity and mortality. This review focusses on the pathophysiology and epidemiology of DKA, but also on the importance of having a standardised definition.
Relevant data were reviewed where there was available basic science or clinical papers published in peer-reviewed international journals on DKA. These included consensus documents and national or international guidelines.
The prevalence of DKA varies around the world, but part of this could be down to the way the condition is defined. Examples of this difference include the recent studies on sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitors in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes which have all been associated with increased rates of DKA, but have highlighted how differences in definitions can make comparisons between agents very difficult.
DKA should only be diagnosed when all three components are present - the 'D', the 'K' and the 'A'. In addition, the definitions used to diagnose DKA should be standardised - in particular for clinical trials.
糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)仍然是最常见的糖尿病相关急症之一,尽管在管理方面有所更新,且护理的标准化程度不断提高,但它仍然具有相当高的发病率和死亡率。本综述重点介绍了 DKA 的病理生理学和流行病学,同时也强调了制定标准化定义的重要性。
对 DKA 的基础科学或临床相关的同行评审国际期刊发表的论文进行了相关数据回顾。这些包括共识文件以及国家或国际指南。
DKA 在世界各地的流行情况有所不同,但部分原因可能是由于对该病症的定义方式不同。这种差异的例子包括最近对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白抑制剂的研究,这些研究都与 DKA 发生率增加有关,但也强调了不同定义之间的差异使得比较不同药物变得非常困难。
只有当同时存在三个组成部分(即“D”、“K”和“A”)时,才应诊断 DKA。此外,用于诊断 DKA 的定义应标准化,特别是对于临床试验。