Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 20;692:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.211. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Plant interactions using volatile organic compounds, particularly in the context of kin recognition have received considerable attention in recent years, but several discrepancies and conflicting results have restricted our understanding. We propose that some of these discrepancies in literature are in part due to integral spatial characteristics of sites, and plant attributes. Chemotypic plasticity is commonly used to characterize kin, particularly in conifers. We studied constitutive and induced monoterpene chemotypes of non-attacked lodgepole pine trees within 30 m radii of pine trees attacked by mountain pine beetle. We tested the effects of volatile compounds emitted from the attacked trees on the non-attacked trees by challenge inoculations with a mountain pine beetle associated fungus. We found no relationship between constitutive monoterpene concentrations of the non-attacked trees and distance or direction from the attacked trees or site aspects. In contrast, the effects of volatile compounds were evident after inoculations, depending on distance from the attacked trees and site aspects. However, these interactions only emerged among chemotypically related trees. These results suggest that plants discriminate between chemical cues from kin and strangers, and the emitters likely aid only chemotypically related plants by emitting specific blends of volatiles that can only be deciphered by the receiving kin. These results further demonstrate the importance of incorporating spatial characteristics of sites and plant attributes in studies aimed at investigating intra-species interactions using volatile organic compounds.
近年来,利用挥发性有机化合物的植物相互作用,特别是在亲缘识别方面,引起了相当大的关注,但一些差异和相互矛盾的结果限制了我们的理解。我们提出,文献中的一些差异部分是由于地点和植物属性的整体空间特征造成的。化学型可塑性通常用于描述亲缘关系,特别是在针叶树中。我们研究了 30 米半径内未受攻击的黑云杉树的组成型和诱导型单萜化学型,这些树位于被山松甲虫攻击的云杉树附近。我们通过用与山松甲虫相关的真菌对受攻击的树进行挑战接种,测试了从受攻击的树释放的挥发性化合物对未受攻击的树的影响。我们没有发现未受攻击的树的组成型单萜浓度与距离或方向从受攻击的树或地点方面有关。相比之下,在接种后,挥发性化合物的影响是明显的,这取决于与受攻击的树的距离和地点方面。然而,这些相互作用只出现在化学型相关的树木之间。这些结果表明,植物可以区分亲缘关系和陌生植物的化学线索,而发射源可能只通过发射特定的挥发性混合物来帮助化学型相关的植物,而接收亲缘关系的植物只能破译这些混合物。这些结果进一步证明了在使用挥发性有机化合物研究种内相互作用时,将地点的空间特征和植物属性纳入研究的重要性。