Evaluation of Proteins and Cells that Adsorb to Dialysis Membranes Used in Continuous Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of AN69ST, Polymethylmethacrylate, and Polysulfone Membranes.

OBJECTIVE

In intensive care medicine, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is important for critically ill patients. Various types of dialysis membranes are currently used in clinical settings, each having unique structures and characteristics. This study aimed to perform a detailed analysis of the characteristics of polysulfone (PS), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polyacrylonitrile (AN69ST) membranes, and to determine differences in the adsorption of proteins and blood cells by membrane material.

METHODS

Subjects were patients undergoing CRRT in the ICU of the Kokura Memorial Hospital. After use, membranes were collected and analyzed. Semi-quantitative analysis of the membrane surface was performed by scanning electron microscopy. We determined the identity of proteins adsorbed to the surface of membranes by TOF/MS analysis, and measured the amount of adsorbed chemical mediators.

RESULTS

Electron microscopy revealed that, compared to PS and PMMA membranes, AN69ST membranes had a greater amount of adsorbed activated white blood cells (WBCs). A large amount of platelets was adsorbed to PMMA membranes. In terms of the amount of adsorbed protein, significantly more proteins adsorbed to AN69ST membranes compared to PS and PMMA membranes. Moreover, TOF/MS analysis revealed a difference in the types of adsorbed proteins by membrane. Chemokines were particularly prevalent among adsorbed proteins for all 3 membranes.

CONCLUSION

Compared to PS and PMMA membranes, AN69ST membranes had a higher capacity to remove activated WBCs. Moreover, apparent differences were noted in the types of proteins that adsorbed to each type of membrane. These differences in membrane properties may impact clinical outcomes.