Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, USA.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019 Dec 15;33(23):1781-1791. doi: 10.1002/rcm.8538.
Determining the flow of energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels in complex systems remains an important task for ecologists. Biomarkers can be used to trace carbon or energy sources contributing to an organism's tissues. However, different biomarkers vary in their ability to trace carbon sources based on how faithfully they transfer between trophic levels. Comparing emerging biomarker techniques with more commonly used techniques can demonstrate the relative efficacy of each in specific systems.
Two common biomarker techniques, fatty acid analysis (FAA) and bulk stable isotope analysis (SIA), and one emerging biomarker technique, compound-specific stable isotope analysis of amino acids (CSIA-AA), were compared to assess their ability to characterize and quantify basal carbon sources supporting the seaside sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus), a common salt marsh species. Herbivorous insect and deposit-feeding fiddler crab biomarker values were analyzed as proxies of major terrestrial and aquatic basal carbon sources, respectively.
All three biomarker techniques indicated that both terrestrial and aquatic carbon sources were important to seaside sparrows. However, FAA could only be evaluated qualitatively, due to a currently limited understanding of trophic modification of fatty acids between primary producer and this consumer's tissues. Quantitative stable isotope (SIA or CSIA-AA) mixing models predicted nearly equal contributions of terrestrial and aquatic carbon sources supporting seaside sparrows, yet estimates based on CSIA-AA had greater precision.
These findings support the use of CSIA-AA as an emerging tool to quantify the relative importance of basal carbon sources in salt marsh consumers. Integrating multiple biomarker techniques, with their differing benefits and limitations, will help to constrain models of carbon and energy flow in future ecosystem studies.
在复杂系统中,确定能量从初级生产者向更高营养级的流动仍然是生态学家的一项重要任务。生物标志物可用于追踪为生物体组织提供碳或能量的来源。然而,不同的生物标志物在追踪碳源的能力上存在差异,这取决于它们在营养级之间传递的忠实程度。将新兴的生物标志物技术与更常用的技术进行比较,可以展示每种技术在特定系统中的相对效果。
本研究比较了两种常用的生物标志物技术,脂肪酸分析(FAA)和总稳定同位素分析(SIA),以及一种新兴的生物标志物技术,氨基酸的特定稳定同位素分析(CSIA-AA),以评估它们在描述和量化支持滨海雀鹀(Ammodramus maritimus)的基础碳源方面的能力,滨海雀鹀是一种常见的盐沼物种。草食性昆虫和底栖觅食的招潮蟹的生物标志物值分别作为主要陆地和水生基础碳源的替代物进行分析。
所有三种生物标志物技术均表明,陆地和水生碳源对滨海雀鹀都很重要。然而,由于目前对初级生产者与该消费者组织之间脂肪酸的营养级修饰的理解有限,因此仅能够定性评估 FAA。定量稳定同位素(SIA 或 CSIA-AA)混合模型预测了支持滨海雀鹀的陆地和水生碳源的贡献几乎相等,但基于 CSIA-AA 的估计值具有更高的精度。
这些发现支持将 CSIA-AA 作为一种新兴工具,用于量化盐沼消费者中基础碳源的相对重要性。整合具有不同优势和局限性的多种生物标志物技术将有助于约束未来生态系统研究中的碳和能量流动模型。