• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始年龄和严重程度对变形性斜头畸形婴儿颅骨重塑矫形治疗的影响。

Effects of Initial Age and Severity on Cranial Remolding Orthotic Treatment for Infants with Deformational Plagiocephaly.

作者信息

Graham Tiffany, Adams-Huet Beverley, Gilbert Nicole, Witthoff Kirsten, Gregory Terran, Walsh Mary

机构信息

Health Care Sciences, Prosthetics-Orthotics Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6011 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9091, USA.

Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8822, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 24;8(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081097.

DOI:10.3390/jcm8081097
PMID:31344968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723372/
Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the effects of an infant's presenting age and severity of deformation on cranial remolding orthotic (CRO) treatment outcomes for patients with deformational plagiocephaly. This study is a retrospective chart review of 499 infants with non-synostotic plagiocephaly who completed CRO treatment. Data collected included age at start of treatment, head shape measurements before and after treatment, total months of CRO treatment, and other factors such as presence/absence of prematurity. The infants were divided into subgroups according to age and severity at initiation of treatment and data for subgroups was analyzed to track the change in head shape over the course of treatment, review overall treatment duration, and discuss the rate of change of cranial deformation. Overall, treatment times tended to statistically increase with increasing initial severity and age. Posttreatment asymmetry measurements statistically trended to greater residual deformation in infants who began treatment in the older or more severe subcategories. This indicates that younger and less severe infants have shorter treatment durations and less residual cranial deformation after CRO treatment. Therefore, clinical consideration may need to be taken to treat infants at younger ages or prior to progression of the cranial deformity.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾婴儿的就诊年龄和畸形严重程度对变形性斜头畸形患者颅骨重塑矫形器(CRO)治疗效果的影响。本研究是对499例完成CRO治疗的非综合征性斜头畸形婴儿进行的回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括治疗开始时的年龄、治疗前后的头型测量值、CRO治疗的总月数以及其他因素,如是否早产。根据治疗开始时的年龄和严重程度将婴儿分为亚组,并分析亚组数据以跟踪治疗过程中的头型变化、回顾总体治疗持续时间并讨论颅骨变形的变化率。总体而言,治疗时间在统计学上倾向于随着初始严重程度和年龄的增加而增加。在年龄较大或病情较严重的亚组中开始治疗的婴儿,治疗后不对称测量在统计学上倾向于有更大的残余变形。这表明年龄较小、病情较轻的婴儿在CRO治疗后的治疗持续时间较短,颅骨残余变形较少。因此,可能需要临床考虑在婴儿较小时或颅骨畸形进展之前进行治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/db73d6b9048a/jcm-08-01097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/2b213ba3bbea/jcm-08-01097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/10f7df85efe6/jcm-08-01097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/db73d6b9048a/jcm-08-01097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/2b213ba3bbea/jcm-08-01097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/10f7df85efe6/jcm-08-01097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2117/6723372/db73d6b9048a/jcm-08-01097-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Initial Age and Severity on Cranial Remolding Orthotic Treatment for Infants with Deformational Plagiocephaly.初始年龄和严重程度对变形性斜头畸形婴儿颅骨重塑矫形治疗的影响。
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 24;8(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081097.
2
Significant Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Cranial Remolding Orthoses in Infants With Deformational Plagiocephaly.影响变形性斜头畸形婴儿颅骨重塑矫形器有效性的重要因素
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Sep;30(6):1710-1713. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005512.
3
Relationship between starting age of cranial-remolding-orthosis therapy and effectiveness of treatment in children with deformational plagiocephaly.颅骨重塑矫形器治疗起始年龄与小儿畸形性斜头畸形治疗效果的关系
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Aug;33(8):1349-1356. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3427-9. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Significant Factors in Cranial Remolding Orthotic Treatment of Asymmetrical Brachycephaly.颅骨重塑矫形治疗非对称性短头畸形的重要因素
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 5;9(4):1027. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041027.
5
Efficacy of Cranial Orthosis for Plagiocephaly Based on 2D and 3D Evaluation.基于二维和三维评估的颅骨矫形器治疗扁头畸形的疗效
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 24;51(2):169-181. doi: 10.1055/a-2222-1494. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
The Role of Age and Initial Deformation on Final Cranial Asymmetry in Infants with Plagiocephaly Treated with Helmet Therapy.年龄和初始变形对接受头盔治疗的斜头畸形婴儿最终颅骨不对称的作用。
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2017;52(5):318-322. doi: 10.1159/000479326. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Craniofacial growth in infants with deformational plagiocephaly: does prematurity affect the duration of head orthosis therapy and the extent of the reduction in asymmetry during treatment?婴儿期因颅面形态畸形导致的斜头畸形的生长情况:早产儿是否会影响头帽矫正治疗的持续时间和治疗过程中不对称程度的减少?
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):2991-2999. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03159-6. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
8
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for the Treatment Time of Deformational Head Shapes Using a Cranial Remolding Orthosis.使用颅骨重塑矫形器的变形头型治疗时间预测模型的开发与验证
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;9(3):354. doi: 10.3390/children9030354.
9
The "back to sleep campaign" and deformational plagiocephaly: is there cause for concern?“仰睡运动”与变形性斜头畸形:是否值得担忧?
J Craniofac Surg. 1996 Jan;7(1):12-8. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199601000-00006.
10
Factors influencing outcomes of the treatment of positional plagiocephaly in infants: a 7-year experience.影响婴儿体位性斜头畸形治疗效果的因素:7年经验
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Mar;19(3):273-281. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16275. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A 10-Year Review of the Efficacy of Cranial Remolding Orthosis Treatment and Factors That Influence Outcomes for Infants with Isolated Deformational Plagiocephaly.对颅骨重塑矫形器治疗孤立性变形性斜头畸形婴儿的疗效及影响预后因素的10年回顾。
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;12(8):1099. doi: 10.3390/children12081099.
2
Natural Progression of Cranial Shape Following Helmet Therapy for Deformational Plagiocephaly.颅骨矫正头盔治疗后头颅形状的自然发展过程:针对变形性斜头畸形
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 9;14(2):357. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020357.
3
Time to successful outcome vs. treatment duration in cranial remolding orthosis treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Significant Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Cranial Remolding Orthoses in Infants With Deformational Plagiocephaly.影响变形性斜头畸形婴儿颅骨重塑矫形器有效性的重要因素
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Sep;30(6):1710-1713. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005512.
2
Cranial growth in infants─A longitudinal three-dimensional analysis of the first months of life.婴儿颅部生长─生命最初几个月的纵向三维分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):987-993. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Head Orthosis Therapy in Positional Plagiocephaly: Influence of Age and Severity of Asymmetry on Effect and Duration of Therapy.
颅骨重塑矫形器治疗中达到成功结果的时间与治疗持续时间的比较。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000388.
4
Success Rates of Cranial Remolding Orthosis Treatment of Plagiocephaly Based on Initial Presentation.基于初始表现的颅骨重塑矫形器治疗斜头畸形的成功率
J Prosthet Orthot. 2024 Oct;36(4):217-223. doi: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000481. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Efficacy of Cranial Orthosis for Plagiocephaly Based on 2D and 3D Evaluation.基于二维和三维评估的颅骨矫形器治疗扁头畸形的疗效
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 24;51(2):169-181. doi: 10.1055/a-2222-1494. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Current understanding of children's head shape and its impact on health: a cross-sectional study among pediatric medical staff in China.当前对儿童头型及其对健康影响的认识:一项在中国儿科医务人员中开展的横断面研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):203-211. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-396. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
7
Cranial Shape Measurements Obtained Using a Caliper and Elastic Bands Are Useful for Brachycephaly and Deformational Plagiocephaly Screening.使用卡尺和弹力带获得的颅骨形状测量值对短头畸形和变形性斜头畸形筛查有用。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 9;12(8):2787. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082787.
8
Practical Review of the Cost of Diagnosis and Management of Positional Plagiocephaly.体位性斜头畸形诊断与治疗成本的实践综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 16;10(5):e4328. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004328. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Cranial Shape in Infants Aged One Month Can Predict the Severity of Deformational Plagiocephaly at the Age of Six Months.1个月大婴儿的颅骨形状可预测6个月大时变形性斜头畸形的严重程度。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 24;11(7):1797. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071797.
10
Outcome Analysis of the Effects of Helmet Therapy in Infants with Brachycephaly.头盔疗法对短头畸形婴儿疗效的结果分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 19;9(4):1171. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041171.
头帽矫形疗法治疗体位性斜头畸形:年龄和不对称严重程度对治疗效果及疗程的影响
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug;140(2):349-358. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003517.
4
Plagiocephaly Severity Scale to Aid in Clinical Treatment Recommendations.用于辅助临床治疗建议的斜头畸形严重程度量表。
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):717-722. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003520.
5
Early diagnosis and treatment of children with skull deformations. The challenge of modern medicine.儿童颅骨畸形的早期诊断与治疗。现代医学面临的挑战。
Dev Period Med. 2016;20(4):289-295.
6
SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Updated 2016 Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping Environment.婴儿猝死综合征及其他与睡眠相关的婴儿死亡:2016年安全婴儿睡眠环境更新建议
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2938. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
7
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on the Role of Cranial Molding Orthosis (Helmet) Therapy for Patients With Positional Plagiocephaly.神经外科医师学会关于颅骨塑形矫正头盔(头盔)治疗姿势性斜头畸形患者作用的系统评价和循证指南。
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):E632-E633. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001430.
8
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on the Management of Patients With Positional Plagiocephaly: The Role of Repositioning.神经外科医师协会关于体位性斜头畸形患者管理的系统评价和循证指南:重新定位的作用
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):E627-E629. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001428.
9
Therapy effects of head orthoses in positional plagiocephaly.头部矫形器在体位性斜头畸形中的治疗效果。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;44(10):1508-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
10
Impact of severity and therapy onset on helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly.严重程度和治疗开始时间对体位性斜头畸形头盔治疗的影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;44(2):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Dec 8.