• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿发热病史无热时的严重细菌感染。

Serious Bacterial Infections in Neonates Presenting Afebrile With History of Fever.

机构信息

Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and

Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3964.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-3964
PMID:31345996
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infants ≤28 days of age with fever are frequently hospitalized while undergoing infectious evaluation. We assessed differences in rates of serious bacterial infection (SBI; bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, urinary tract infection) and invasive bacterial infection (IBI; bacteremia, bacterial meningitis) among the following neonates: (1) febrile at presentation (FP), (2) afebrile with history of fever without subsequent fever during hospitalization, and (3) afebrile with history of fever with subsequent fever during hospitalization.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of neonates evaluated for SBI during emergency department evaluation between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2017. Patients were categorized into FP, afebrile with no subsequent fever (ANF), and afebrile with subsequent fever (ASF) groups. We compared rates of SBI and IBI between groups using logistic regression and assessed time to fever development using time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

Of 931 neonates, 278 (29.9%) were in the ANF group, 93 (10.0%) were in the ASF group, and 560 (60.2%) were in the FP group. Odds of SBI in neonates ANF were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.79) compared with infants FP, although differences in IBI were not statistically significant (0.52, 95% CI 0.19-1.51). In infants ASF, median time to fever was 5.6 hours (interquartile range, 3.1-11.4). Infants ASF had higher odds of SBI compared to infants FP (odds ratio 1.93, 95% CI 1.07-3.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with history of fever who remain afebrile during hospitalization may have lower odds for SBI and be candidates for early discharge after an observation period.

摘要

背景

≤28 天龄的发热婴儿在接受感染评估时常需住院。我们评估了以下新生儿中严重细菌性感染(SBI;菌血症、细菌性脑膜炎、尿路感染)和侵袭性细菌性感染(IBI;菌血症、细菌性脑膜炎)的发生率差异:(1)发热时就诊(FP),(2)无热但有发热史且住院期间无后续发热,(3)无热但有发热史且住院期间有后续发热。

方法

我们对 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间因 SBI 接受急诊评估的新生儿进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。患者分为 FP、无热但无后续发热(ANF)和无热但有后续发热(ASF)组。我们使用逻辑回归比较了各组间 SBI 和 IBI 的发生率,并使用生存时间分析评估了发热发展的时间。

结果

在 931 名新生儿中,278 名(29.9%)为 ANF 组,93 名(10.0%)为 ASF 组,560 名(60.2%)为 FP 组。与 FP 组相比,ANF 新生儿发生 SBI 的几率为 0.42(95%置信区间[CI]0.23-0.79),而 IBI 差异无统计学意义(0.52,95%CI0.19-1.51)。在 ASF 新生儿中,发热中位时间为 5.6 小时(四分位间距 3.1-11.4)。与 FP 组相比,ASF 组新生儿 SBI 的几率更高(比值比 1.93,95%CI1.07-3.50)。

结论

住院期间有发热史但无热的新生儿发生 SBI 的可能性较低,在观察期后可作为提前出院的候选者。

相似文献

1
Serious Bacterial Infections in Neonates Presenting Afebrile With History of Fever.新生儿发热病史无热时的严重细菌感染。
Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3964.
2
Invasive bacterial infections in young afebrile infants with a history of fever.有发热史的无热婴幼儿侵袭性细菌感染。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jul;103(7):665-669. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313578. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
Factors associated with serious bacterial infections in infants ≤60 days with hypothermia in the emergency department.与急诊科体温过低的≤60 天婴儿严重细菌感染相关的因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1139-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Infants Aged ≤60 Days Presenting to Emergency Departments with a History of Fever Only.≤60 天龄发热婴儿就诊于急诊科的严重细菌感染风险。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.043. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
5
Paediatric emergency departments should manage young febrile and afebrile infants the same if they have a fever before presenting.儿科急诊部门应该对有发热症状和无发热症状的发热和不发热婴儿进行相同的处理,如果他们在就诊前有发热症状。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Oct;111(10):2004-2009. doi: 10.1111/apa.16483. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
6
Prevalence of Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infant 61-90 Days Old Compared With Younger Infants.61-90 天龄发热婴儿与年龄较小婴儿的细菌感染发生率比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Dec;38(12):1163-1167. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002461.
7
A week-by-week analysis of the low-risk criteria for serious bacterial infection in febrile neonates.发热新生儿严重细菌感染低风险标准的逐周分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):287-92. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.138768. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
8
Febrile Infants ≤60 Days Old With Positive Urinalysis Results and Invasive Bacterial Infections.60 天以下发热婴儿,尿液分析阳性结果伴侵袭性细菌感染。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec;10(12):1120-1125. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000638.
9
Enhanced urinalysis improves identification of febrile infants ages 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial illness.强化尿液分析有助于识别60日龄及以下、患严重细菌性疾病风险较低的发热婴儿。
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):866-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.866.
10
Serious bacterial infection risk in recently immunized febrile infants in the emergency department.急诊近期免疫接种发热婴儿发生严重细菌感染的风险。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;80:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A quality improvement approach to improving care of febrile infants.一种改善发热婴儿护理的质量改进方法。
Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Nov 20;29(3):135-143. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxad070. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Physician's conceptions of the decision-making process when managing febrile infants ≤ 60 days old: a phenomenographic qualitative study.管理60日龄及以下发热婴儿时医生对决策过程的认知:一项现象学定性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04548-x.
3
Paediatric emergency departments should manage young febrile and afebrile infants the same if they have a fever before presenting.
儿科急诊部门应该对有发热症状和无发热症状的发热和不发热婴儿进行相同的处理,如果他们在就诊前有发热症状。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Oct;111(10):2004-2009. doi: 10.1111/apa.16483. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Management of acute fever in children: Consensus recommendations for community and primary healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa.儿童急性发热的管理:撒哈拉以南非洲社区和初级医疗保健提供者的共识性建议
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;11(2):283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.