Suppr超能文献

呼吸机相关 bundle 转变:从预防呼吸机相关性肺炎到预防呼吸机相关性事件。

Ventilator Bundles in Transition: From Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia to Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Events.

机构信息

Associate Editor for Respiratory Care.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2019 Aug;64(8):994-1006. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06966.

Abstract

Implementation of ventilator bundles is associated with reductions in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the new surveillance model of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) has shifted the focus from VAP to objective, generalized signs of pulmonary decompensation not specific to VAP. This raises the question of whether the ventilator bundle also is effective in reducing VAE. This narrative review examined 6 studies published since 2013 that assessed the impact of ventilator bundles on the incidence of VAE, and a seventh study that examined its impact on mortality. All 7 studies were low-level evidence, and only 1 study was prospective. The findings among the studies were inconsistent, and the only prospective study found no difference in bundle adherence between those who did and did not develop VAE. However numerous factors may explain the apparent lack of efficacy. Most of these factors were related to the retrospective nature of the studies, such as suboptimal documentation of bundle procedures and the presence of potential non-modifiable risk factors, as well as insufficient performance of most bundle components. In some studies, low VAE incidence also raised uncertainty about the veracity of results. Despite these limitations, there was evidence suggesting that stress ulcer prophylaxis may increase VAE risk, and oral care with chlorhexidine may increase both VAE and mortality risk. The largest study found significant reductions in duration of intubation with weaning, sedation, and head of bed elevation, as well as reduced mortality risk with weaning and sedation bundle elements. Nonetheless, these studies should be useful in designing future prospective controlled studies to determine what elements of a future prevention bundle might be effective in reducing VAEs. At this juncture, and based on the limited evidence to date, it appears that incorporating daily sedation interruptions and spontaneous breathing trials are the factors most likely to reduce VAEs.

摘要

呼吸机集束干预措施的实施与呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的减少有关。然而,新的呼吸机相关性事件(VAEs)监测模式已将重点从 VAP 转移到肺部失代偿的客观、普遍迹象,而这些迹象并非 VAP 所特有。这就提出了一个问题,即呼吸机集束干预措施是否也能有效降低 VAEs。本叙述性综述分析了自 2013 年以来发表的 6 项评估呼吸机集束干预措施对 VAEs 发生率影响的研究,以及 1 项评估其对死亡率影响的研究。这 7 项研究均为低水平证据,只有 1 项为前瞻性研究。这些研究的结果不一致,唯一的前瞻性研究发现,发生 VAE 和未发生 VAE 的患者在集束干预措施的依从性方面没有差异。然而,有许多因素可能解释这种明显的无效性。这些因素大多与研究的回顾性有关,例如集束干预措施程序的记录不完整以及潜在的不可改变的危险因素的存在,以及大多数集束干预措施的实施不足。在一些研究中,VAEs 的低发生率也使结果的真实性存在不确定性。尽管存在这些局限性,但有证据表明,应激性溃疡预防可能会增加 VAEs 的风险,而使用洗必泰进行口腔护理可能会增加 VAEs 和死亡率的风险。最大的研究发现,在脱机、镇静和床头抬高方面,呼吸机使用时间、死亡率均有显著减少,并且脱机和镇静集束干预措施的死亡率风险降低。尽管如此,这些研究对于设计未来的前瞻性对照研究以确定未来预防集束中哪些元素可能有效降低 VAEs 是有用的。在这一阶段,根据迄今为止有限的证据,似乎每天中断镇静和自主呼吸试验是最有可能降低 VAEs 的因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验