Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nephrology (Carlton). 2020 Mar;25(3):239-247. doi: 10.1111/nep.13638. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue used in research in haemodialysis vary widely in the dimensions assessed; and the importance of these dimensions to patients and health professionals is unknown. This study aimed to identify the most important dimensions of fatigue to assess in patients on haemodialysis participating in trials.
In an international survey, patients/caregivers and health professionals rated the absolute and relative importance of content and measurement dimensions to include in a core outcome measure of fatigue. A 9-point Likert scale (7-9 indicating critical importance) was used to assess absolute importance and best-worst scale was used to assess importance of each dimension compared to others.
In total, 169 patients/caregivers and 336 health professionals from 60 countries completed the survey. Both groups (patients/caregivers and health professionals) rated life participation (7.55), tiredness (7.40), level of energy (7.37), ability to think clearly (7.15), post-dialysis fatigue (7.13), motivation (7.03) and ability to concentrate (7.03) as critically important (mean Likert score greater than 7) content dimensions to include in a core outcome measure. Compared to patients and caregivers, health professionals rated post-dialysis fatigue, memory and verbal abilities more highly. Based on the relative importance scores, life participation was ranked most highly above all content dimensions. Severity was rated and ranked the most important measurement dimension by all stakeholders.
A core outcome measure of fatigue should assess impact of fatigue on life participation, tiredness and level of energy, using a severity scale. A consistent and valid measurement of fatigue will improve the value of trials in supporting decision-making based on this important outcome.
用于血液透析研究的患者报告结局测量疲劳在评估维度上差异很大;这些维度对患者和卫生专业人员的重要性尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定血液透析患者参与试验时评估疲劳的最重要维度。
在一项国际调查中,患者/照顾者和卫生专业人员对纳入疲劳核心结局测量的内容和测量维度的绝对重要性和相对重要性进行了评分。使用 9 分 Likert 量表(7-9 表示至关重要)评估绝对重要性,使用最佳最差量表评估每个维度与其他维度相比的重要性。
共有来自 60 个国家的 169 名患者/照顾者和 336 名卫生专业人员完成了这项调查。两组(患者/照顾者和卫生专业人员)都将生活参与度(7.55)、疲劳感(7.40)、精力水平(7.37)、思维清晰能力(7.15)、透析后疲劳(7.13)、动力(7.03)和注意力集中能力(7.03)评为包含在核心结局测量中至关重要的(平均 Likert 评分大于 7)内容维度。与患者和照顾者相比,卫生专业人员更看重透析后疲劳、记忆力和语言能力。基于相对重要性评分,生活参与度在所有内容维度中排名最高。严重程度被所有利益相关者评为最重要的测量维度。
疲劳的核心结局测量应使用严重程度量表评估疲劳对生活参与度、疲劳感和精力水平的影响。一致和有效的疲劳测量将提高试验在基于这一重要结局进行决策方面的价值。