Villa Gianluca, Giua Rosa, Amass Timothy, Tofani Lorenzo, Chelazzi Cosimo, Pinelli Fulvio, De Gaudio A Raffaele, Romagnoli Stefano
Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
J Vasc Access. 2020 Mar;21(2):154-160. doi: 10.1177/1129729819861187. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
In a previous trial, in-line filtration significantly prevented postoperative phlebitis associated with short peripheral venous cannulation. This study aims to describe the cost-effectiveness of in-line filtration in reducing phlebitis and examine patients' perception of in-hospital vascular access management with and without in-line filtration.
We analysed costs associated with in-line filtration: these data were prospectively recorded during the previous trial. Furthermore, we performed a follow-up for all the 268 patients enrolled in this trial. Among these, 213 patients responded and completed 6 months after hospital discharge questionnaires evaluating the perception of and satisfaction with the management of their vascular access.
In-line filtration group required 95.60€ more than the no-filtration group (a mean of € 0.71/patient). In terms of satisfaction with the perioperative management of their short peripheral venous cannulation, 110 (82%) and 103 (76.9%) patients, respectively, for in-line filtration and control group, completed this survey. Within in-line filtration group, 97.3% of patients were satisfied/strongly satisfied; if compared with previous experiences on short peripheral venous cannulation, 11% of them recognised in-line filtration as a relevant causative factor in determining their satisfaction. Among patients within the control group, 93.2% were satisfied/strongly satisfied, although up to 30% of them had experienced postoperative phlebitis. At the qualitative interview, they recognised no difference than previous experiences on short peripheral venous cannulation, and mentioned postoperative phlebitis as a common event that 'normally occurs' during a hospital stay.
In-line filtration is cost-effective in preventing postoperative phlebitis, and it seems to contribute to increasing patient satisfaction and reducing short peripheral venous cannulation-related discomfort.
在之前的一项试验中,在线过滤显著预防了与外周浅静脉置管相关的术后静脉炎。本研究旨在描述在线过滤在减少静脉炎方面的成本效益,并考察患者对有或无在线过滤的院内血管通路管理的看法。
我们分析了与在线过滤相关的成本:这些数据是在之前的试验中前瞻性记录的。此外,我们对本试验纳入的所有268例患者进行了随访。其中,213例患者在出院6个月后回复并完成了评估其血管通路管理看法和满意度的问卷调查。
在线过滤组比未过滤组多花费95.60欧元(平均每位患者0.71欧元)。就对外周浅静脉置管围手术期管理的满意度而言,在线过滤组和对照组分别有110例(82%)和103例(76.9%)患者完成了此项调查。在在线过滤组中,97.3%的患者表示满意/非常满意;与之前外周浅静脉置管的经历相比,11%的患者认为在线过滤是决定其满意度的一个相关因素。在对照组患者中,93.2%的患者表示满意/非常满意,尽管其中高达30%的患者经历过术后静脉炎。在定性访谈中,他们认为与之前外周浅静脉置管的经历没有差异,并提到术后静脉炎是住院期间“通常会发生”的常见事件。
在线过滤在预防术后静脉炎方面具有成本效益,并且似乎有助于提高患者满意度并减少外周浅静脉置管相关的不适。