Suppr超能文献

大前庭水管综合征患者的人工耳蜗植入效果——我们是否应该更早地提供人工耳蜗植入?

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome-Should We Provide Cochlear Implants Earlier?

机构信息

Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2019 Sep;40(8):e769-e773. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002314.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Examine postoperative speech perception outcomes in a large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) patients at a major cochlear implantation center.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre (SCIC) database and medical records from January 1994 to December 2015 was performed.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with a diagnosis of LVAS who received a cochlear implant (CI). Only those with speech perception outcomes recorded at least 12 months post implant were included in our analysis.

INTERVENTION(S): Therapeutic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Postoperative speech perception scores.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2015, 176 adult and pediatric patients with a diagnosis of LVAS underwent cochlear implantation at SCIC. Postoperative Bamford-Kowal Bench (BKB) sentence test scores were obtained for 97 patients. The postoperative median BKB score was 93% with a lower quartile score of 85% and an upper quartile score of 98%. Smaller numbers were available for post-CI City University of New York (CUNY) and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores yet similar excellent results were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest the CI should be considered when BKB scores have dropped to 85%. We suggest that rather than LVAS cases representing a challenge to cochlear implantation, they are amongst the best candidates for surgery, and should receive a CI at an earlier stage in hearing loss, when they have better speech perception. This allows stable hearing to be established earlier along with excellent speech perception outcomes.

摘要

目的

在一家大型人工耳蜗植入中心,检查大型前庭水管综合征(LVAS)患者的术后言语感知结果。

研究设计

对 1994 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月悉尼人工耳蜗植入中心(SCIC)数据库和病历进行回顾性分析。

设置

三级转诊中心。

患者

诊断为 LVAS 并接受人工耳蜗植入(CI)的患者。仅纳入那些术后至少 12 个月有言语感知结果记录的患者进行分析。

干预措施

治疗。

主要观察指标

术后言语感知评分。

结果

1994 年至 2015 年间,176 名成人和儿科 LVAS 患者在 SCIC 接受了人工耳蜗植入。97 名患者获得了术后巴姆福德-科瓦尔 Bench(BKB)句子测试评分。术后中位数 BKB 评分为 93%,下四分位数评分为 85%,上四分位数评分为 98%。可获得的术后纽约城市大学(CUNY)和辅音-核-辅音(CNC)词评分的数量较小,但也出现了类似的优异结果。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,当 BKB 评分降至 85%时,应考虑使用 CI。我们建议,LVAS 病例并非代表对人工耳蜗植入的挑战,而是手术的最佳候选者之一,并且应该在听力损失早期更早地接受 CI,因为他们有更好的言语感知。这可以更早地建立稳定的听力,并获得优异的言语感知结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验