Department of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 84322, USA.
Mpala Research Centre, P.O. Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya.
Ecol Appl. 2019 Dec;29(8):e01982. doi: 10.1002/eap.1982. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Rangelands are governed by threshold dynamics, and factors such as drought, wildfire, and herbivory can drive change across thresholds and between ecological states. Most work on this topic has focused on shifts in a single response variable, vegetation, and little research has considered how to reconcile responses of more than one variable to determine whether a system has undergone a genuine state change. In sub-Saharan Africa, mobile overnight livestock corrals (bomas) can be used by managers to precipitate ecological transitions from areas dominated by bare ground to productive ecosystem hotspots (glades) that are attractive to wild herbivores. We asked how long bomas must be occupied by cattle before undergoing a state change, considering both plant and animal response variables, to glade ecosystem hotspots. We tested five durations of boma occupation: 0, 4, 7, 14, and 28 days. Each treatment was replicated five times, and we assessed vegetation as well as herbivore dung (as a proxy of use) at multiple time points over 3 yr following boma abandonment. Vegetation in 7-, 14-, and 28-d boma duration treatments appeared to undergo a complete transition to glade-like plant communities, whereas the shortest 4-d treatment had not converted to a glade plant community by year 3. Wildlife responses appeared to lag behind vegetation responses, with transitions to glade-like herbivore use occurring only in the longest duration (14- and 28-d) treatments. Our results show that different response variables, when considered individually, may provide incomplete or misleading information about state changes. Although shorter-occupied bomas might be effective for reducing bare ground, they may not attract enough wild herbivores to constitute crossing into an alternative state. Understanding threshold dynamics associated not only with vegetation responses but with a broader suite of response variables is challenging, but will provide a more complete representation of ecosystem function and greater opportunity for more successful ecosystem management.
牧场受阈限动态控制,干旱、野火和放牧等因素可导致跨越阈限和生态状态之间的变化。关于这个主题的大多数工作都集中在单一响应变量(植被)的变化上,很少有研究考虑如何协调多个变量的响应,以确定系统是否经历了真正的状态变化。在撒哈拉以南非洲,流动的夜间牲畜畜栏(畜栏)可被管理者用于促使生态转变,使以裸露地面为主的地区转变为对野生食草动物有吸引力的多产生态热点(林间空地)。我们询问了牛只占用畜栏多长时间后会发生状态变化,同时考虑了植物和动物的响应变量,以形成林间空地生态热点。我们测试了畜栏占用 5 种不同的时间长度:0、4、7、14 和 28 天。每个处理重复 5 次,在畜栏废弃后 3 年的多个时间点,我们评估了植被和食草动物粪便(作为使用的代理)。7、14 和 28 天的畜栏持续时间处理的植被似乎完全过渡到了类似林间空地的植物群落,而最短的 4 天处理在第 3 年尚未转变为林间空地植物群落。野生动物的反应似乎滞后于植被的反应,只有在最长持续时间(14 天和 28 天)的处理中,才向类似林间空地的食草动物使用过渡。我们的研究结果表明,当单独考虑时,不同的响应变量可能会提供不完整或误导性的状态变化信息。虽然较短时间占用的畜栏可能有效减少裸露地面,但它们可能不会吸引足够的野生食草动物,无法形成替代状态。了解不仅与植被响应有关,而且与更广泛的响应变量集有关的阈限动态具有挑战性,但这将提供对生态系统功能更完整的描述,并为更成功的生态系统管理提供更多机会。