Jähne-Raden Nico, Gütschleg Henrike, Marschollek Michael
Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics University of Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:11-14. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190004.
We conducted a literature review on the use of accelerometers in medical context, on Pubmed and IEEEXplore. This includes 440 relevant articles. The subsequently identified publications were classified with regard to the medical context (prevention, diagnostics, therapy) as well as according to medical-informatics field of application, e.g. activity-tracking, fall prevention/detection and gait analysis. Furthermore, we analyzed their clinical integration or potential for the clinical usage, including both the technical integration into the clinical structures and respective claims and requirements, e.g. privacy or hygiene. This analysis shows five categories ("without indication" to "concrete implementation"). In 90% no statement was made on clinical integration. Only two articles could be found with concrete implementations, but these descriptions are limited to a more conceptual technical side. This poor situation in final clinical integration has to change in the future, because only by the premise "from workbench to bedside" the medical benefit is given.
我们在PubMed和IEEE Xplore上对加速度计在医学领域的应用进行了文献综述。这包括440篇相关文章。随后,根据医学背景(预防、诊断、治疗)以及医学信息学应用领域,如活动跟踪、跌倒预防/检测和步态分析,对所识别出的出版物进行了分类。此外,我们分析了它们的临床整合情况或临床使用潜力,包括技术上融入临床结构以及各自的要求和规定,如隐私或卫生方面。该分析显示了五个类别(“无适应症”到“具体实施”)。90%的文章未提及临床整合情况。仅发现两篇文章有具体实施案例,但这些描述仅限于较为概念性的技术方面。最终临床整合方面的这种糟糕状况在未来必须得到改变,因为只有在“从实验台到病床边”这一前提下,才能实现医学效益。