• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 TAVI 治疗的患者的二尖瓣反流:严重程度和病因对临床结局的影响。

Mitral valve regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVI: Impact of severity and etiology on clinical outcome.

机构信息

Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 15;299:228-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.060. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.060
PMID:31353154
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently associated with severe aortic stenosis, but its influence on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains controversial. This study sought to assess the baseline etiology and degree of MR in TAVI population, identify the predictors of MR changes and investigate the clinical and prognostic impact of baseline MR at mid and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We enrolled 572 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI. MR degree and etiology were evaluated by echocardiography at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were obtained up to 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, 168 patients (29%) had moderate-to-severe MR (MR ≥ 2). Organic MR was more frequently associated with MR ≥ 2 (MR < 2: 20%, MR ≥ 2: 43%, p < 0.001). Relevant MR had improved more in functional MR (79%) compared to organic MR (50%, p = 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, the coexistence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.026), absence of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.038) and functional etiology (p = 0.025) were predictors of MR improvement after TAVI. Patients with baseline MR ≥ 2 had a higher mortality rate than those with MR < 2 at 1-year and 3-year follow-up. Moreover, a landmark analysis starting from 1-year to 3-year follow-up, demonstrated that organic MR was associated with an increased risk of mortality throughout 3-year follow-up compared with functional MR, irrespective of MR severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline MR ≥ 2 in TAVI patients was associated with early and late mortality rate. At 1-year, significant improvement in MR severity was observed mainly in patients with functional MR ≥ 2. Organic MR ≥ 2 had a negative impact on 3-year, but not 1-year, mortality rate.

摘要

背景

二尖瓣反流(MR)常与严重主动脉瓣狭窄相关,但在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后对其结局的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估 TAVI 人群中基线病因和 MR 程度,确定 MR 变化的预测因素,并在中-长期随访中探讨基线 MR 的临床和预后影响。

方法

我们纳入了 572 例连续接受 TAVI 的患者。通过超声心动图在基线和 1 年随访时评估 MR 程度和病因。临床结局随访至 3 年。

结果

基线时,168 例(29%)患者存在中重度 MR(MR≥2)。器质性 MR 更常与 MR≥2 相关(MR<2:20%,MR≥2:43%,p<0.001)。与器质性 MR 相比,功能性 MR 的相关 MR 改善更为显著(79%比 50%,p=0.001)。多变量分析显示,合并冠状动脉疾病(p=0.026)、无房颤(p=0.038)和功能性病因(p=0.025)是 TAVI 后 MR 改善的预测因素。基线时 MR≥2 的患者在 1 年和 3 年随访时的死亡率高于 MR<2 的患者。此外,从 1 年到 3 年随访的时间标志分析显示,与功能性 MR 相比,无论 MR 严重程度如何,基线时存在器质性 MR 与整个 3 年随访期间的死亡率增加相关。

结论

TAVI 患者基线时的 MR≥2 与早期和晚期死亡率相关。在 1 年时,主要在功能性 MR≥2 的患者中观察到 MR 严重程度的显著改善。器质性 MR≥2 对 3 年而不是 1 年的死亡率有负面影响。

相似文献

1
Mitral valve regurgitation in patients undergoing TAVI: Impact of severity and etiology on clinical outcome.经 TAVI 治疗的患者的二尖瓣反流:严重程度和病因对临床结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 15;299:228-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.060. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
Tricuspid but not Mitral Regurgitation Determines Mortality After TAVI in Patients With Nonsevere Mitral Regurgitation.三尖瓣反流而非二尖瓣反流决定了非重度二尖瓣反流患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的死亡率。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 May;71(5):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Mitral regurgitation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation influences survival but not symptoms.经导管主动脉瓣植入术前的二尖瓣反流影响生存率,但不影响症状。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.129. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Mitral Regurgitation in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing TAVR: Insights From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的二尖瓣反流:TOPAS-TAVI 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):567-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.042. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
Prognostic impact and change of concomitant mitral regurgitation after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄行外科或经导管主动脉瓣置换术后合并二尖瓣反流的预后影响及变化
J Cardiol. 2016 Jun;67(6):526-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Impact of mitral regurgitation aetiology on the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.二尖瓣反流病因对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结局的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):526-536. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01062.
7
Impact of Functional Versus Organic Baseline Mitral Regurgitation on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.功能性与器质性二尖瓣反流基线对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后短期和长期结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;117(5):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.064. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
8
Relationship between Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multi-Institutional Follow-up Study.二尖瓣反流与经导管主动脉瓣植入术的关系:一项多机构随访研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Jun;116(6):1059-1069. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190772.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with concomitant mitral and tricuspid regurgitation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗合并二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流的患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;95(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.030. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
10
The predictive value of a modified Carpentier classification in patients with coincidental mitral regurgitation undergoing TAVI for severe aortic valve stenosis1.改良的Carpentier分类法对因严重主动脉瓣狭窄接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)且合并二尖瓣反流患者的预测价值1。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(1):15-25. doi: 10.3233/CH-189906.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.经导管主动脉瓣置入术后单纯主动脉瓣反流患者永久性起搏器植入的结局
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 22;26(5):26543. doi: 10.31083/RCM26543. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Risk factors and predictive models for post-operative moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a machine learning approach.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后发生中重度二尖瓣反流的危险因素及预测模型:一种机器学习方法
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 10;25(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04759-9.
3
Prognostic Implications and Predictors of Mitral Regurgitancy Reduction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后二尖瓣反流减少的预后意义及预测因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 18;60(12):2077. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122077.
4
Comparing moderate-severe and severe mitral regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve replacement on 1-year survival: insights from a Japanese Nationwide Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中中度至重度与重度二尖瓣反流对1年生存率的影响:来自日本全国性注册研究的见解
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jun;40(6):523-530. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02491-6. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Association of Mitral Valve Geometry at CT with Secondary Mitral Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation.主动脉瓣反流患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后CT测量的二尖瓣几何形态与继发性二尖瓣反流的相关性
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 2;25(7):241. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507241. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on mitral regurgitation - a single center study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)对二尖瓣反流的影响——一项单中心研究
Cardiol J. 2024;31(6):833-842. doi: 10.5603/cj.98792. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
7
Aortic Stenosis and the Evolution of Cardiac Damage after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的主动脉瓣狭窄与心脏损伤的演变
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 17;13(12):3539. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123539.
8
Prognostic Impact of Residual Moderate Mitral Regurgitation Following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后残余中度二尖瓣反流的预后影响。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Oct 27;39(1):e20230012. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0012.
9
Determinants and treatments of heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: moving up a notch.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后心力衰竭的决定因素和治疗:更上一层楼。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2183-2199. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14435. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
10
Echocardiographic Evaluation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comprehensive Review.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的超声心动图评估:全面综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;13(5):1079. doi: 10.3390/life13051079.