Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rochester, MN, USA; Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rochester, MN, USA.
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 May;29(5):785-792. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.06.724. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction can occur after cardiac surgery and persist for years. We assessed perioperative RV systolic function in patients undergoing mitral valve (MV) repair and further compared minimally invasive robotic-assisted mitral valve repair (MIMVr) vs standard 'open' MV repair (MVr). Speckle tracking (RV free wall strain [RVS]) was used as a sensitive echocardiography method to assess RV function.
Retrospective analysis, over 3 years, of consecutive patients (n = 158) referred to Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA). Preoperative, pre-discharge and 1 year transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed. A prospective pilot study was performed for sample size estimation. Primary outcome was RV free wall strain (RVS).
Right ventricular free wall strain declined after MV repair surgery (-22.6 ± 7% vs -15 ± 6%, p < 0.001). There were smaller reductions in RVS in MIMVr vs MVr group (-6.0 ± 9% vs -10.3 ± 8%, p < 0.01), which persisted after adjusting for baseline values (RVS treatment effect 1.5%, p = 0.007). There was greater recovery in MIMVr vs MVr group at 1 year follow-up vs pre-surgery values (-3.4 ± 9% vs -8.1 ± 8% respectively, p < 0.001, RVS treatment effect 1.7%, p = 0.001). Bypass time was higher in the MIMVr group (80min ± 22 vs 40min ± 20, p < 0.0001). The echo findings remained significant correcting for age, pulmonary pressures and change in ejection fraction.
Right ventricular systolic dysfunction is common after MV repair surgery. Deterioration in RV contraction is less pronounced following MIMVr vs MVr and is associated with enhanced RV functional recovery at 1 year, albeit not to preoperative levels. This may potentially be associated with clinical functional improvement but further studies are warranted to investigate this.
右心室(RV)功能障碍可在心脏手术后发生,并持续多年。我们评估了接受二尖瓣(MV)修复术的患者围手术期 RV 收缩功能,并进一步比较了微创机器人辅助二尖瓣修复术(MIMVr)与标准“开放”MV 修复术(MVr)。斑点追踪(RV 游离壁应变[RVS])被用作评估 RV 功能的敏感超声心动图方法。
对 3 年来连续就诊于梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州罗切斯特市)的患者(n=158)进行回顾性分析。回顾术前、出院前和 1 年经胸超声心动图。前瞻性进行了一项样本量估算的初步研究。主要结局为 RV 游离壁应变(RVS)。
MV 修复手术后 RV 游离壁应变下降(-22.6±7% vs -15±6%,p<0.001)。MIMVr 组的 RVS 下降幅度较小(-6.0±9% vs -10.3±8%,p<0.01),调整基线值后仍持续存在(RVS 治疗效果 1.5%,p=0.007)。与术前相比,MIMVr 组在 1 年随访时的恢复程度更大(-3.4±9% vs -8.1±8%,分别为 p<0.001,RVS 治疗效果 1.7%,p=0.001)。MIMVr 组的体外循环时间较高(80min±22 比 40min±20,p<0.0001)。即使校正射血分数的变化,年龄、肺压的超声发现仍然显著。
MV 修复术后常出现 RV 收缩功能障碍。与 MVr 相比,MIMVr 后 RV 收缩恶化程度较轻,且与 1 年时 RV 功能恢复增强相关,但仍未恢复至术前水平。这可能与临床功能改善相关,但需要进一步研究来证实这一点。