Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Oct;28(10):104289. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for about 20% of strokes. Nonstenotic cervical arterial plaque may be a mechanism of stroke in a subset of these patients.
A cohort of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke was retrospectively identified from a stroke registry. Patients with unilateral anterior circulation embolic stroke due to atrial fibrillation (AF) or consistent with ESUS who underwent computed tomographic neck angiography were included. The prespecified primary outcome was a comparison of the prevalence of carotid plaque greater than or equal to 3 mm thickness ipsilateral versus contralateral to the infarct side.
Of 772 screened patients, 96 patients with ESUS and 99 patients with AF were included. Plaque greater than or equal to 3 mm was more frequently ipsilateral than contralateral to the infarct in patients with ESUS (41% versus 29%, P = .03), and plaque thickness was greater ipsilateral compared to contralateral (median 2.5 versus 2.2 mm, P = .02). No significant differences in plaque characteristics ipsilateral compared to contralateral were found in patients with AF. The prevalence of ipsilateral versus contralateral plaque was greater in ESUS patients less than or equal to 65 years old (48% versus 19%, P < .01), but no different in patients greater than 65 years old (35% versus 39%, P = .57).
Nonstenotic cervical carotid plaque is more common ipislateral to the infarction in patients with ESUS, but not in patients with AF, supporting an underlying atheroembolic mechanism in a subset of ESUS patients. This association might be greater in younger ESUS patients.
不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)约占卒中的 20%。非狭窄性颈总动脉斑块可能是这些患者亚组发生卒中的一种机制。
从卒中登记处回顾性确定了连续的缺血性卒中患者队列。纳入了因房颤(AF)或符合 ESUS 导致单侧前循环栓塞性卒中且接受计算机断层颈部血管造影的患者。预先规定的主要结局是比较梗死侧同侧与对侧颈动脉斑块厚度大于或等于 3 毫米的发生率。
在筛选出的 772 例患者中,纳入了 96 例 ESUS 患者和 99 例 AF 患者。ESUS 患者中,斑块厚度大于或等于 3 毫米的同侧发生率高于对侧(41%比 29%,P=0.03),且同侧斑块厚度大于对侧(中位数 2.5 毫米比 2.2 毫米,P=0.02)。在 AF 患者中,同侧与对侧斑块特征无显著差异。ESUS 患者中年龄小于或等于 65 岁的患者同侧与对侧斑块的发生率更高(48%比 19%,P<.01),但年龄大于 65 岁的患者无差异(35%比 39%,P=0.57)。
在 ESUS 患者中,非狭窄性颈总动脉斑块在梗死的同侧比对侧更常见,但在 AF 患者中并非如此,支持在 ESUS 患者亚组中存在潜在的动脉粥样硬化栓塞机制。这种关联在年轻的 ESUS 患者中可能更大。